Chromaticity and Luminance as Coding Dimensions in Visual Search

Abstract

Visual search times were measured as a function of chromaticity and luminance differences between a target and distractor stimuli. Results showed that mean search time increased linearly with the number of distractors if the luminance difference between target and distractors was small but was roughly constant if the luminance difference was large. Similar results were previously found for chromaticity differences. With the number of distractor stimuli held constant, the mean search time decreased with increases in the difference between target and distractors, up to some critical difference. Further increases in target-distractor difference had little effect. Results were similar for targets defined by luminance and chromaticity. There was some advantage to combining luminance differences with chromaticity differences when the target was dimmer than the distractors. Generally there was no advantage for combining a chromaticity difference with a luminance difference when the target was brighter than the distractors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boynton, R. M. (1979). Human color vision. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Carter, R. C. (1982). Visual search with color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 127–136.

Carter, R. C. (1989). Calculate (don't guess) the effects of symbol size on usefulness of color. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 1368–1372). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Carter, E. C. , and Carter, R. C. (1981). Color and conspicuousness. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 71, 723–729.

Carter, R. C. , and Carter, E. C. (1988). Color coding for rapid location of small symbols. Color Research and Application, 13, 226–234.

Christ, R. E. (1975). Review and analysis of color coding research for visual displays. Human Factors, 17, 542–570.

Lippert, T. M. (1986). Color-difference prediction of legibility performance for CRT raster imagery. Society for Information Display Digest, 17, 86–89.

MacLeod, D. I. A. , and Boynton, R. M. (1979). Chromaticity diagram showing cone excitation by stimuli of equal luminance. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 69, 1183–1186.

Murch, G. M. (1984). Physiological principles for the effective use of color. IEEE Color Graphics and Applications, 4, 49–53.

10.

Nagy, A. L. , and Sanchez, R. R. (1990). Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 1209–1217.

11.

Nagy, A. L. , Sanchez, R. R. , and Hughes, T. C. (1990). Visual search for color differences with foveal and peripheral vision. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 7, 1995–2001.

12.

Post, D. L. , Constanza, E. B. , and Lippert, T. M. (1982). Expression of color contrast as equivalent luminance contrast. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 581–585). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

13.

Silverstein, L. , Lepkowski, J. S. , Carter, E. C. , and Carter, R. C. (1986). Modeling of display color parameters and algorithmic color selection. In Proceedings of the International Society of Optical Engineers, 624, 26–35.

14.

Treisman, A. , and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

15.

Treisman, A. , and Gormican, S. (1988). Feature analysis in early vision: Evidence from search asymmetries. Psychological Review, 95, 15–48.

16.

Walraven, J. (1985). The colours are not on the display: A survey of non-veridical perceptions that may turn up on a colour display. Displays, 6, 35–42.

17.

Wyszecki, G. , and Fielder, G. H. (1971). New colormatching ellipses. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 61, 1135–1152.