Distance and Organization in Multifunction Displays

Abstract

One approach to organizing information in a multifunction display (MFD) is to place related screens of information closer to each other. This study identified three metrics that could be used to operationalize the concept of distance in an MFD. The proposed distance metrics--navigational (the number of choice points lying between two screens), organizational (the hierarchical structure of the data base), and cognitive (the user's perception of relationships among screens)--were empirically examined by using a simulated, hierarchically arranged, menu-driven MFD in an aviation context. Subjects engaged in two tasks that required them to access different target screens from various starting screens in a 290-screen MFD. The tasks differed in the navigational mechanisms subjects were allowed to use to navigate around the MFD and the relationships between the starting and target screens. The results suggest that the three distance metrics are meaningful within the context of a multifunction display.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andre, A. D. , and Wickens, C. D. (1990). Display-control compatibility in the cockpit: Guidelines for display layout analysis (Tech. Report ARL-90-12/NASA-A31-90-1). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.

Curran, J. (1991, September). Multidimensional ELS user interface (SAE Tech. Paper Series 912108). Presented at the Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition, Long Beach, CA.

Fisher, D. L. , Yungkurth, E. J. , and Moss, S. M. (1990). Optimal menu hierarchy design: Syntax and semantics. Human Factors, 32, 665–683.

Lee, E. , and MacGregor, J. (1985). Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors, 27, 157–192.

MacGregor, J. , Lee, E. , and Lam, N. (1986). Optimizing the structure of database menu indexes: A decision model of menu search. Human Factors, 28, 387–399.

Miller, D. P. (1981). The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 296–300). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Norman, K. (1991). The psychology of menu selection. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Reising, J. M. , and Curry, D. G. (1987). A comparison of voice and multifunction controls: Logic design is the key. Ergonomics, 30, 1063–1078.

Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. , and Paap, K. R. (1986). Cognitive networks as a guide to menu organization: An application in the automated cockpit. Ergonomics, 29, 1301–1311.

10.

Seidler, K. S. , Wickens, C. D. , and Davis, T. (1991). Distance and organization in multifunction displays (Tech. Report ARL-91-9/NASA-A3I-19-1-3). Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory.

11.

Snowberry, K. , Parkinson, S. R. , and Sisson, N. (1983). Computer display menus. Ergonomics, 26, 699–712.

12.

Somberg, B. L. , Boggs, G. J. , and Picardi, M. C. (1982, October). Search and decision processes in human interaction with menu-driven systems. Paper presented at the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting, Seattle, WA.

13.

Vicente, K. J. , and Williges, R. C. (1988). Accommodating indi vidual differences in searching a hierarchical file system. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 29, 647–668.

14.

Webb, J. M. , and Kramer, A. F. (1990). Maps or analogies? A comparison of instructional aids for menu navigation. Human Factors, 32, 251–266.