When completing tasks in complex, dynamic domains observers must consider the relationships among many variables (e.g., integrated tasks) as well as the values of individual variables (e.g., focused tasks). A critical issue in display design is whether or not a single display format can achieve the dual design goals of supporting performance at both types of tasks. We consider this issue from a variety of perspectives. One relevant perspective is the basic research on attention and object perception, which concentrates on the interaction between visual features and processing capabilities. The principles of configurality are discussed, with the conclusion that they support the possibility of achieving the dual design goals. These considerations are necessary but not sufficient for effective display design. Graphic displays map information from a domain into visual features; the tasks to be completed are defined in terms of the domain, not in terms of the visual features alone. The implications of this subtle but extremely important difference are discussed. The laboratory research investigating alternative display formats is reviewed. Much like the attention literature, the results do not rule out the possibility that the dual design goals can be achieved.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barnett, B. J., and Wickens, C. D. (1988). Display proximity in multicue information integration: The benefits of boxes. Human Factors, 30, 15–24.
2.
Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology.London: Cambridge University Press.
3.
Beltracchi, L. (1987). A direct manipulation interface for heat engines based upon the Rankine cycle. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 478–487.
4.
Bennett, K. B., Toms, M. L., and Woods, D. D. (in press). Emergent features and configural elements: Designing more effective configural displays. Human Factors.
5.
Boulette, M. D., Coury, B. G., and Bezar, N. A. (1987). Classification of multidimensional data under time constraints: Evaluating digital and configural display representations. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 31st Annual Meeting (pp. 116–120). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
6.
Bransford, J. D., and Franks, J. T. (1972). The abstraction of linguistic ideas: A review. Cognition, 1, 211–249.
7.
Buttigieg, M. A., and Sanderson, P. M. (1991). Emergent features in visual display design for two types of failure detection tasks. Human Factors, 33, 631–651.
8.
Carswell, C. M., and Wickens, C. D. (1987). Information integration and the object display. Ergonomics, 30, 511–527.
9.
Carswell, C. M., and Wickens, C. D. (1990). The perceptual interaction of graphical attributes: Configurality, stimulus homogeneity, and object integration. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 157–168.
10.
Casey, E. J., and Wickens, C. D. (1986). Visual display representation of multidimensional systems: The effect of information correlation and display integrality (Tech. Report CPL-86-2). Urbana-Champaign: Cognitive Psychophysiology Laboratory, University of Illinois.
11.
Cheng, P. W., and Pachella, R. G. (1984). A psychophysical approach to dimensional separability. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 279–304.
12.
Chernikoff, R., and Lemay, M. (1963). Effects of various display-control configurations on tracking with identical and different coordinate dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 95–99.
13.
Coekin, J. A. (1970). An oscilloscope polar coordinate display for multidimensional data. The Radio and Electronic Engineer, 40(2), 97–101.
14.
Coury, B. G., Boulette, M. D., and Smith, R. A. (1989). Effect of uncertainty and diagnosticity on classification of multidimensional data with integral and separable displays of system status. Human Factors, 31, 551–570.
15.
Craik, F. I. M., and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal behavior, 11, 671–684.
16.
Dolan, N. J., Elvers, G. C., and Schmidt, J. (1991). Measurement scale and zero point indicators affect object display separate and integral task performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 35th Annual Meeting (pp. 1589–1592). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
17.
Flach, J. M., and Vicente, K. J. (1989). Complexity, difficulty, direct manipulation and direct perception (Tech. Report EPRL-89-03). Urbana-Champaign: Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
18.
Garner, W. R. (1970). The stimulus in information processing. American Psychologist, 25, 350–358.
19.
Garner, W. R. (1974). The processing of information and structure. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Garner, W. R., and Felfoldy, G. L. (1970). Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 225–241.
21.
Gentner, D. (1983). Structural mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155–170.
22.
Gentner, D., and Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24.
Goettl, B. P., Wickens, C. D., and Kramer, A. F. (1991). Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data. Ergonomics, 34, 1047–1063.
25.
Goldsmith, T. E., and Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1984). Facilitating multiple-cue judgments with integral information displays. In J. C. Thomas and M. L. Schneider (Eds.), Human factors in computer systems (pp. 243–270). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26.
Hansen, J. P. (1991). An ecological approach to process control displays: Representation of invariants by perspective surfaces. Unpublished manuscript.
27.
Hutchins, E. L., Hollan, J. D., and Norman, D. A. (1986). Direct manipulation interfaces. In D. A. Norman and S. W. Draper (Eds.), User-centered system design (pp. 87–124). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Jones, P. M., Wickens, C. D., and Deutsch, S. J. (1990). The display of multivariate information: An experimental study of an information integration task. Human Performance, 3(1), 1–17.
29.
Loftus, E. F. (1980). Memory.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
30.
MacGregor, D., and Slovic, P. (1986). Graphic representation of judgmental information. Human-Computer Interaction, 2, 179–200.
31.
Pomerantz, J. R. (1986). Visual form perception: An overview. In H. C. Nusbaum and E. C. Schwab (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines (Vol. 2, pp. 1–30). Orlando, FL: Academic.
32.
Pomerantz, J. R., and Garner, W. R. (1973). Stimulus configuration in selective attention tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 565–569.
33.
Pomerantz, J. R., and Pristach, E. A. (1989). Emergent features, attention, and perceptual glue in visual form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 635–649.
34.
Pomerantz, J. R., Sager, L. C., and Stoever, R. J. (1977). Perception of wholes and of their component parts: Some configural superiority effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 422–435.
35.
Rasmussen, J. (1986). Information processing and humanmachine interaction: An approach to cognitive engineering.New York: North-Holland.
36.
Rasmussen, J., and Vicente, K. (1989). Coping with human errors through system design: Implications for ecological interface design. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 31, 517–534.
37.
Sanderson, P. M., Flach, J. M., Buttigieg, M. A., and Casey, E. J. (1989). Object displays do not always support better integrated task performance. Human Factors, 31, 183–198.
38.
Smith, L. B., and Kilroy, M. C. (1979). A continuum of dimensional separability. Perception and Psychophysics, 25(4), 285–291.
39.
Treisman, A. M. (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. Boff, L. Kaufmann, and J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (pp. 35-1-35–70). New York: Wiley.
40.
Vicente, K. J. (1991). Supporting knowledge-based behavior through ecological interface design (Tech. Report EPRL-91-1). Urbana-Champaign: Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory and Aviation Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
41.
Vicente, K. J., and Rasmussen, J. (1990). The ecology of human-machine systems. II: Mediating “direct perception” in complex work domains. Ecological Psychology, 2(3), 207–249.
42.
Wickens, C. D. (1986). The effects of control dynamics on performance. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, and J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance (Vol. 2, 39-1–39-60). New York: Wiley.
43.
Wickens, C. D., and Andre, A. D. (1988). Proximity compatibility and the object display. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (pp. 1335–1339). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
44.
Wickens, C. D., and Andre, A. D. (1990). Proximity compatibility and information display: Effects of color, space, and objectness on information integration. Human Factors, 32, 61–78.
45.
Wickens, C. D., Kramer, A., Barnett, B., Carswell, M., Fracker, L., Goettl, B., and Harwood, K. (1985). Display-cognitive interface: The effect of information integration requirements on display formatting for C3 displays (Tech. Report EPL-85-3). Urbana-Champaign: Engineering Psychology Research Laboratory and Aviation Research Laboratory, University of Illinois.
46.
Woods, D. D. (1991). The cognitive engineering of problem representations. In G. R. S. Weir and J. L. Alty (Eds.), Human-computer interaction and complex systems (pp. 169–188). London: Academic.
47.
Woods, D. D., and Roth, E. M. (1988). Cognitive systems engineering. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction (pp. 1–41). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
48.
Woods, D. D., Wise, J., and Hanes, L. (1981). An evaluation of nuclear power plant safety parameter display systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 110–114). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
