A Controlled Investigation of In-Field Attenuation Performance of Selected Insert,Earmuff,and Canal Cap Hearing Protectors

Abstract

A field study assessed the actual spectral noise attenuation achieved by 40 industrial workers wearing four different hearing protection devices (HPDs) while on the job. The effect of two different HPD fitting procedures (subject fit vs. trained fit) on attenuation performance over two three-week periods of protector use was determined. Subjects were retrieved from their workplaces without prior knowledge of when they were to be tested and were not permitted to readjust the fit of their HPDs. Attenuation data were then collected using psychophysical procedures testing real ear attenuation at threshold. Statistical analyses indicated that the earplugs′ attenuation significantly improved when training for proper fitting was used, whereas the earmuff and the ear canal cap were relatively insensitive to the training effect. The training was most effective for a slow-recovery foam plug over the three-week period. Results confirmed that laboratory protocols designed to simulate workplace influences on attenuation may not be relied on to yield reasonable estimates of field protection performance of HPDs, particularly for earplugs; however, the laboratory results were much better predictors of field protection for the earmuff. This study also demonstrated that the labeled manufacturers′ noise reduction ratings (NRRs) substantially overestimated the actual field attenuation performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ANSI S3.19-1974 (1974). Method for the measurement of real-ear protection of hearing protectors and physical attenuation of earmuffs. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.

ANSI S3.21-1978. (1978). Methods for manual pure-tone audiometry. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.

ANSI 512.6-1984. (1984). Method for the measurement of real-ear attenuation of hearing protectors. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.

ANSI Z24.22-1957 (1957). Method for the measurement of real-ear attenuation of ear protectors at threshold. New York: American National Standards Institute, Inc.

Behar, A. (1985). Field evaluation of hearing protectors. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 24, 13–18.

Bekesy, G. V. (1960). Experiments in hearing. New York: McGraw-Hili.

Berger, E. H. (1988). Can real-world hearing protector attenuation be estimated using laboratory data? Sound and Vibration, 22(12), 26–31.

Casali, J. G. (1988). A computer-controlled facility for hearing protection research and testing: Verification re ANSI S12.6-1984 (IEOR Tech. Report 8801). Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Casali, J. G. , and Lam, S. T. (1986). Effects of user instructions on earmuff/earcap sound attenuation. Sound and Vibration, 20(5), 22–28.

10.

Casali, J. G. , and Park, M.-Y. (1990). Attenuation performance of four hearing protectors under dynamic movement and different user fitting conditions. Human Factors, 32, 9–25.

11.

Crawford, D. R. , and Nozza, R. J. (1981, May 29). Field performance evaluation of wearer-molded ear inserts. Paper presented at the American Industrial Hygiene Conference, Portland, OR.

12.

Edwards, R. G. , Broderson, A. B. , Green, W. W. , and Lempert, B. L. (1983). A second study of the effectiveness of earplugs as worn in the workplace. Noise Control Engineering Journal, 20, 6–15.

13.

Edwards, R. G. , Hauser, W. P. , Moiseev, N. A. , and Broderson, A. B. (1978). Effectiveness of earplugs as worn in the workplace. Sound and Vibration, 12(1), 12–22.

14.

Environmental Protection Agency . (1990). Product noise labeling. In 40 Code of Federal Regulations, 211 (pp. 128–144). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

15.

Gasaway, D. C. (1988, May). Hearing protection guide directs users to manufacturers/devices by category. Occupational Health and Safety, 57(5), 33-51.

16.

Hachey, G. A. , and Roberts, J. T. (1983, May 22-27). Real-world effectiveness of hearing protection. Paper presented at American Industrial Hygiene Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

17.

Morrill, J. C. (1986). Hearing measurement. In E. H. Berger , J. C. Morrill , L. H. Royster , and W. D. Ward (Eds.), Noise and hearing conservation manual (pp. 233–292). Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association.

18.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (1981). Occupational noise exposure: Hearing conservation amendment. Federal Register, 46(11), 4078–4181.

19.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (1983). OSHA Instruction CPL 2-2.35A, December 19, 1983 (pp. A-1; update to the Field operations manual and Industrial hygiene field operations manual). Washington, DC: OSHA.

20.

Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (1988). Occupational noise exposure. In 29 Code of Federal Regulations, 1910.95 (pp. 176-191) Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

21.

Padilla, M. (1976). Ear plug performance in industrial field conditions. Sound and Vibration, 10(5), 33–36.

22.

Park, M.-Y. (1991). Field evaluation of noise attenuation and comfort performance of earplug, earmuff, and ear canal cap hearing protectors under the ANSI S12.6-1984 sound field standard. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.

23.

Pfeiffer, B. H. , Kuhn, H. D. , Specht, U. , and Knipfer, C. (1989). Sound attenuation by hearing protectors in the real world (BIA Report 5/89; pp. 1–74). Mainz, Germany: Professional Institute for Occupational Safety.

24.

Regan, D. E. (1978). Real ear attenuation of personal ear protective devices worn in industry. In Proceedings of the Technical Program: NOISEXPO (p. 100). Chicago: National Noise and Vibration Control Conference.

25.

Riko, K. , and Alberti, P. W. (1982). How ear protectors fail: A practical guide. In P. W. Alberti (Ed.), Personal hearing protection in industry (pp. 323–338). New York: Raven.

26.

Robinette, M. S. (1984). Audiometric program's value rising with hearing loss claims. Occupational Health and Safety, 53(2), 23–24.