The goal of this research was to determine a safe slow robot motion speed to be used for intervention tasks conducted in proximity to an industrial robot (e.g., programming and maintenance) when environmental factors were considered. The relevant factors associated with a robot station were dictated by previous research (Beauchamp and Stobbe, 1990). They were the illumination level, the luminance contrast between the robot and its background, the motion speed of the robot, and the field in which unexpected motions were initiated. The dependent variable measured was the distance the robot moved before the subject detected and responded to the unexpected robot motion. From the results, a multiple regression model was derived for predicting robot overrun distance. The model suggested that speeds in excess of 17 cm/s do not provide an adequate safety margin, and that 17 cm/s should be recommended as the maximum robot slow speed for work conducted in the vicinity of an industrial robot not equipped with dead-man switches.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American National Standards Institute. (1986). American national safety standard for industrial robots and industrial robot systems (ANSI R15.06). New York: Author.
2.
Beauchamp, Y. (1989). A study of human performance in the event of an unexpected robot motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
3.
Beauchamp, Y., Imbeau, D., and Stobbe, T. J. (1990). Applying human factors engineering to man-robot systems. In Proceedings of the International Industrial Engineering Conference (pp. 481–486). Atlanta: Institute of Industrial Engineering.
4.
Beauchamp, Y., and Stobbe, T. J. (1990). The effect of environmental factors on the human performance in the event of an unexpected robot motion. Journal of Safety Research, 21, 83–96.
5.
Carlsson, J. (1984). Robot accidents in Sweden 1979–1983. Solna, Sweden: National Board of Occupational Safety and Health.
6.
Carlsson, J., Harms-Ringdahl, L., and Kjellen, U. (1983). Industrial robot and accidents at work (Report TRITAAOG-0026). Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology.
7.
Collins, J. W. (1986. July). Hazard prevention in automated factories. Robotics Engineering, pp. 8–11.
8.
Collins, J. W. (1989). Analysis of the effect of diameter and location of emergency stop button on hand-held robot teach pendant design. Unpublished master's thesis, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV.
9.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H. (1981). Applied regression analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
10.
Etherton, J., Beauchamp, Y., Nunez, G., and Ahluwalia, R. (1988). Human response to unexpected robot movements at selected slow speeds. In W. Karwowski, H. R. Parsaei, and M. R. Wilhelm (Eds.), Ergonomics of hybrid automated systems I (pp. 381–389). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11.
Etherton, J., and Sneckenberger, J. E. (1988). A robot safety experiment varying robot speed and contrast with human decision cost. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 32nd Annual Meeting (p. 953). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
12.
Karwowski, W., Parsaei, M., Nash, D. L., and Rahimi, M. (1988). Human perception of the work envelope of an industrial robot. In W. Karwowski, H. R. Parsaei, and M. R. Wilhelm (Eds.), Ergonomics of hybrid automated systems I (pp. 421–428). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
13.
Linger, M. (1985). Are robots safe? (Yes when they are in tune) (Tech. Report 461921). Göteborg, Sweden: Swedish Institute of Production Engineering Research.
Nagamachi, M. (1986). Human factors of industrial robots and robot safety management in Japan. Applied Ergonomics, 17, 9–18.
16.
National Safety CounciL (1985). Robots. (Safety Data Sheet 1-717-85). Chicago: Author.
17.
Nicolaisen, P. (1985). Occupational safety and industrial robots. In M. C. Bonney and Y. F. Yong (Eds.), Robot safety (pp. 33–48). Bedford, England: IFS Publications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
18.
Nicolaisen, P. (1986). Ways of improving industrial safety for the programming of industrial robots. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Factors in Manufacturing (pp. 263–275). Bedford, England: IFS Publications.
19.
Occupational Safety and Health Department, Japan Ministry of Labor. (1983). Study on accidents involving industrial robots. Tokyo: Author. (Translation PB83-239822; Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.)
20.
Percival, N. (1985). Safety standards in robotics. In M. C. Bonney and Y. F. Yong (Eds.), Robot safety (pp. 17–21). Bedford, England: IFS Publications, New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Richtlinie, V. (1984). Technical safety requirements in the construction, equipment, and operation of industrial robots (HSE Translation 11004). London: Health and Safety Executive.
22.
Sugimoto, A. (1984). Limits of industrial robot teaching speeds through teaching operation tests. In A collection of papers contributed to conferences held by the Machinery Institute of Japan (pp. 844–845). Tokyo: Japan Industrial Safety and Health Association.
23.
Van Deest, R. (1984). Robotic safety a potential crisis. Professional Safety, 28, 40–42.
24.
Wickens, C. D. (1984). Engineering psychology and human performance. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
