This experiment was designed to investigate whether well-learned “automatic” processes remain stable as a function of age, as well as to determine whether the ability to modify these automatic processes is disrupted for older adults. We used an arithmetic Stroop task to measure the stability of an automatic process. Nineteen young (mean age 22) and 19 old (mean age 75) adults participated in three experimental sessions, each of which consisted of 15 blocks of 30 trials. Although the young subjects had faster verification times overall than did The Old Adults, Both Young And Old Subjects Showed Significant Interference Effects. For The Young Adults, There Was A Decrease In The Interference Effect With Practice, Which Suggested That They Were Learning To Inhibit The Automatic Process Of Performing The Arithmetical Operation. However, The Old Adults Showed No Significant Decrease In The Associative Interference Effects. This Implies That The Older Adults Were Impaired In Their Ability To Inhibit Automatic Processes, Even When Those Processes Interfered With Performance. Theoretical And Practical Training Implications Are Discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P. L., and Schneider, W. (1984, November). Practice effects and a model for Stroop interference. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, TX.
2.
Chiarello, C., Church, K. L. and Hoyer, W. J. (1985). Automatic and controlled semantic priming: Accuracy, response bias, and aging. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 595–600.
3.
Cohn, N. B., Dustman, R. E., and Bradford, D. C. (1984). Age-related decrements in Stroop color test performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1244–1250.
4.
Comalli, P. E., Wapner, S., and Werner, H. (1962). Interference effects of Stroop color-word test in childhood, adulthood, and aging. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 100, 47–53.
5.
Dyer, F. N. (1973). The Stroop phenomenon and its use in the study of perceptual, cognitive, and response processes. Memory and Cognition, 1, 106–120.
6.
Fisk, A. D., Ackerman, P. L., and Schneider, W. (1987). Automatic and controlled processing theory and its applications to human factors problems. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 159–197). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
7.
Fisk, A. D., McGee, N. D., and Giambra, L. M. (1988). The influence of age on consistent and varied semantic category search performance. Psychology and Aging, 3, 323–333.
8.
Fisk, A. D., and Rogers, W. A. (1989). Toward an understanding of age-related memory and visual search effects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9.
Fisk, A. D., Rogers, W. A., and Giambra, L. M. (1990). Consistent and varied memory/visual search: Is there an interaction between age and response-set effects?Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 45, P81–P87.
10.
Harbeson, M. M., Krause, M., Kennedy, R. S., and Bittner, A. C. (1982). The Stroop as a performance evaluation test for environmental research. Journal of Psychology, 111, 223–233.
11.
Hasher, L., and Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processing in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.
12.
Hock, H. S., and Egeth, H. (1970). Verbal interference with encoding in a perceptual classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 299–303.
13.
Light, L. L., and Singh, A. (1987). Implicit and explicit memory in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 531–541.
14.
Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 367–386.
15.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492–527.
16.
Panek, P. E., Rush, M. C., and Slade, L. A. (1984). Locus of the age-stroop interference relationship. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 145, 209–216.
17.
Posner, M. I., and Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18.
Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.
19.
Rogers, W. A. (1989). Target and distractor learning in visual search: Age-related differences. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
20.
Schneider, W., and Detweiler, M. (1987). A connectionist/control architecture for working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 21, pp. 53–118). New York: Academic.
21.
Schneider, W., and Detweiler, M. (1988). The role of practice in dual-task performance: Toward workload modeling in a connectionist/control architecture. Human Factors, 30, 539–566.
22.
Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1984). Automatic and control processing and attention. In R. Parasuraman, R. Davies, and J. Beatty (Eds.), Varieties of attention (pp. 1–27). New York: Academic.
23.
Shiffrin, R. M. (1988). Attention. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, and R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 739–811). New York: Wiley.
24.
Shiffrin, R. M., and Dumais, S. (1981). The development of automatism. In J. A. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 111–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
26.
Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised.New York: Psychological Corporation.
27.
Winkelman, J. H., and Schmidt, J. (1974). Associative confusions in mental arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 734–736.
28.
Zbrodoff, N. J., and Logan, G. D. (1986). On the autonomy of mental processes: A case study of arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 118–130.
