Trunk Strength during Asymmetric Trunk Motion

Abstract

It is important to understand how trunk strength varies as a function of workplace factors so that the work environment can be designed to minimize the risk of low back injury. In this study maximal trunk torque production around the lumbosacral junction was measured in 44 subjects as trunk concentric and eccentric isokinetic velocity and trunk asymmetric line of action were varied. Trunk torque decreased by approximately 8.5% of maximum for every 15 deg of asymmetric trunk angle. Increases in concentric velocity decreased trunk strength, whereas increases in eccentric trunk velocity increased strength. Significant interactions were also found, and it was determined that the common finding that eccentric strength exceeds concentric strength is true only for forward trunk angles at all asymmetric angles. These results should have significant implications for the design of manual materials handling tasks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersson, G. B. (1981). Epidemiologic aspects of low back pain in industry. Spine, 6, 5360.

Garg, A. , and Badger, D. (1986). Maximum acceptable weights and maximum voluntary isometric strengths for asymmetric lifting. Ergonomics 29, 879–892.

Industrial Commission of Ohio, Division of Safety and Hygiene Research and Statistics Section . (1987). Ohio back injury statistics report for 1986. Ohio Monitor, 60(10),4–9.

Kim, J. Y. , and Marras, W. S. (1987). Quantitative trunk muscle electromyography during lifting at different speeds. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1, 219–229.

Marras, W. S. , Joynt, R. L. , and King, A. I. (1985). The force-velocity relation and intra-abdominal pressure during lifting activities. Ergonomics, 28, 603–613.

Marras, W. S. , King, A. I. , and Joynt, R. L. (1984). Measurements of loads on the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions. Spine, 9, 176–188.

Marras, W. S. , Rangarajulu, S. L. , and Wongsam, P. E. (1987). Trunk force development during static and dynamic lifts. Human Factors, 29, 19–29.

Marras, W. D. , Sudhakar, L. R. , and Lavender, S. A. (1989). Three-dimensional measures of trunk motion components during manual materials handling in industry. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 33rd Annual Meeting (pp. 662–666). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Marras, W. S. , Wongsam, P. E. , and Rangarajulu, S. L. (1986). Trunk motion during lifting: The relative cost. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1, 103–113.

10.

Mital, A. , and Fard, H. F. (1986). Psychophysical and physiological responses to lifting symmetrical and asymmetrical loads symmetrically and asymmetrically. Ergonomics, 29, 1263–1272.

11.

National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health . (1981). Work practices guide for manual lifting (DHHS Publication No. 81-122). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

12.

Reid, J. G. , and Costigan, P. A. (1987). Trunk muscle balance and muscular force. Spine, 12, 783–786.

13.

Smidt, G. L. , Amundsen, L. R. , and Dostal, W. F. (1980). Muscle strength at the trunk. Journal of Orthopedic and Sports Physical Therapy, 1, 165–170.

14.

Troup, J. D. G. , and Edwards, F. C. (1985). Manual handling and lifting. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.