Effects of Handle Angle and Work Orientation on Hammering: II. Muscle Fatigue and Subjective Ratings of Body Discomfort

Abstract

This research investigated how changes in hammer handle angle and hammering orientation affected muscle fatigue in the forearm and subjective ratings of body discomfort. Forearm muscle fatigue and discomfort ratings were not significantly affected by handle angle, but they were significantly higher in the wall hammering orientation than in the bench orientation. The research in this article and in the companion article (Part I) reveal that for novices, hammers with handles angled in the range of 20-40 deg are advantageous because (1) they reduce ulnar deviation and may possibly decrease the incidence of hand/wrist disorders, and (2) they do not significantly affect hammering performance in the bench conditions, forearm muscle fatigue, or subjective ratings of body discomfort.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Basmajian, J. V. , and De Luca, C. J. (1985). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.

Chaffin, D. B. (1969). Surface electromyography frequency analysis as a diagnostic tool. Journal of Occupational Medicine, 11(3), 109–115.

Chaffin, D. B. , and Andersson, G. B. J. (1984). Occupational biomechanics. New York: Wiley.

Corlett, E. N. , and Bishop, R. P. (1976). A technique for assessing postural discomfort. Ergonomics, 19, 175–182.

Hagberg M. (1981). Electromyographic signs of shoulder muscular fatigue in two elevated arm postures. American Journal of Physical Medicine 60(3), 111–121.

Lippold, O. C. , Redfearn, W. T. , and Vuco, J. (1960). The electromyography of fatigue. Ergonomics, 3, 121–131.

Merletti, R. , Biey, D. , Biey, M. , Prato, G. , and Orusa, A. (1985). On-line monitoring of the median frequency of the surface EMG power spectrum. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-32, 1–7.

NIOSH. (1989). Manual of surface electromyography for use in ergonomic studies of musculoskeletal injuries. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Petrofsky, J. S. , Glaser, R. M. , and Phillips, C. A. (1982). Evaluation of the amplitude and frequency components of the surface EMG as an index of muscle fatigue. Ergonomics, 25, 213–223.

10.

Petrofsky, J. S. , and Lind, A. R. (1980). Frequency analysis of the surface electromyogram during sustained isometric contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 43, 173–182.

11.

Schoenmarklin, R. W. , and Marras, W. S. (1989). Effects of handle angle and work orientation on hammering. I: Wrist motion and hammering performance. Human Factors, 31, 397–411.

12.

Stulen, F. B. , and De Luca, C. J. (1981). Frequency parameters of the myoelectric signal as a measure of muscle conduction velocity. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-28, 515–523.