Perception of Risk in Automotive Systems

Abstract

Thirty subsystems constituting a functioning motor vehicle, including brake, steering, suspension, engine, electrical, and fuel systems, were evaluated by individuals on a set of risk characteristic scales. These included overall vehicle riskiness, manufacturer's anticipatory knowledge of system defects during vehicle design, likelihood of severe consequences in the event of system failure, controllability of the vehicle, and observability of impending failure. An analysis of the resulting judgments revealed two composite factors, one representing the controllability of consequences and the other representing observability. Both factors were highly related to judgments of risk, desire for risk regulation, and anticipated recall compliance. A comparison of risk judgments with accident data suggested that for some vehicle systems, particularly those serving a communication function in the driving task, drivers may underestimate the actual risk they face when system performance has degraded.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Evans, L. (1985). Factors controlling traffic crashes (Research Publication GMR-5122). Detroit, MI: General Motors Research Laboratories.

Federal Highway Administration . (1983). Fatal and injury accident rates on federal-aid and other highway systems. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation.

Middendorf, L. (1984). Warnings in automotive systems. In G. A. Peters and B. J. Peters (Eds.), Automotive engineering and litigation (Vol. 1, pp. 575–594). New York: Garland Law.

National Safety Council . (1987). Accident facts. Chicago: Author.

Sabey, B. E. , and Taylor, H. (1980). The known risks we run: The highway. In R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers (Eds.), Societal risk assessment: How safe is safe enough? New York: Plenum.

Sheridan, T. B. (1981). Understanding human error and aiding human diagnostic behavior in nuclear power plants. In J. Rasmussen and W. B. Rouse (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures (pp. 19–35).

Shneiderman, B. (1987). Designing the user interface. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280–285.

Slovic, P. , Fischhoff, B. , and Lichtenstein, S. (1984). Behavioral decision theory perspectives on risk and safety. Acta Psychologica, 56, 183–203.

10.

Slovic, P. , Fischhoff, B. , and Lichtenstein, S. (1985). Characterizing perceived risk. In R. W. Kates , C. Hohenemser , and J. X. Kasperson (Eds.), Perilous progress: Managing the hazards of technology (pp. 91–123). Boulder, CO: Westview.

11.

Slovic, P. , MacGregor, D. , and Kraus, N. (1987). Perception of risk from automobile safety defects. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 19, 359–373.

12.

Thompson, D. A. (1981). Commercial aircrew detection of system failures: State of the art and future trends. In J. Rasmussen and W. B. Rouse (Eds.), Human detection and diagnosis of system failures (pp. 37–48). New York: Plenum.

13.

Treat, J. R. (1980). A study of precrash factors involved in traffic accidents. Highway Safety Research Institute Research Review, 10:(6), 1–35.

14.

Treat, J. R. , and Joscelyn, D. B. (1973). Results of a study to determine accident causes. Detroit: Society of Automotive Engineers.

15.

Treat, J. R. , and Stansifer, R. L. (1977). Vehicular problems as accident causes: An overview of available information. Detroit: Society of Automotive Engineers.