Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

An approach for measuring the cognitive complexity of visual displays is discussed and applied to a dynamic display of avionic information. A semantic network formalism is used to model two interrelated knowledge systems, world knowledge and display knowledge. The information the operator receives during training about the general display format characteristics and the task requirements, along with other previously stored information, constitutes world knowledge. The semantic content of a particular configuration of information encountered during task performance constitutes display knowledge. Four orthogonal predictor measures of cognitive complexity were derived from the networks. In an experiment three of the orthogonal predictors were significantly correlated with task performance. After averaging across operators, the three significant predictors accounted for 99% of the variation of display effectiveness. Results indicate that a model of cognitive complexity based on a semantic network formalism may provide a useful technique for quantitatively evaluating the quality of competing display format concepts.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Anderson, J. R. , and Bower, G. H. (1973). Human associative memory. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston. Distributed by John Wiley, New York.

Eggleston, R. G. , Chechile, R. A. , Fleischman, R. N. , and Sasseville, A. M. (1986). Modeling the cognitive complexity of visual displays. Proceeding of the Human Factors Society 30th Annual Meeting (pp. 675-678). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Kantowitz, B. H. , and Sorkin, R. D. (1983). Human factors: Understanding people-systems relationships. New York: Wiley.

Kerlinger, F. N. , and Pedhazur, E. J. (1973). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

McDonald, J. E. , Stone, J. D. , Liebelt, L. S. , and Karat, J. (1982). Evaluating a method for structuring the usersystem interface. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 551–555). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

McCormick, E. J. (1976). Human factors in engineering and design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Norman, D. A. , Rumelhart, D. E., and the LNR Research Group . (1975). Explorations in cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.

10.

Shurtleff, D. A. (1980). How to make displays legible. La Mirada, CA: Human-Interface Design.

11.

Tullis, T. (1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors, 25, 657–682.

12.

Tullis, T. (1984). A computer-based tool for evaluating alphanumeric displays. In Proceedings of Interact 1984 Conference on Human-Computer Interactions (Vol. 2, pp. 123–127). London: Academic Press.

13.

Woods, D. D. (1985). Knowledge-based development of graphic display systems. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 325–329). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Modeling the Cognitive Content of Displays

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References