Visual Displays: The Highlighting Paradox

Abstract

Office computer users view well over a billion displays in a given year. The savings of only a fraction of a second in the time it takes users to process each display can potentially lead to enormous time and cost savings. In recent research investigators have shown that on average subjects are quicker to find a target option in a highlighted display than in a display without highlighting. Paradoxically, in related research other investigators have shown that subjects are slower to find a target in a highlighted display than in a display without highlighting. In an attempt to resolve this paradox, an additional set of experiments was performed. Results from these experiments suggest that in order to determine whether highlighting will be of benefit, one must know the type of highlighting, the level of highlighting validity, and the probability that subjects attend first to the highlighted options.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Banks, W. P. , Bachrach, K. M. , and Larson, D. W. (1977). The asymmetry of lateral interference in visual letter identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 22, 232–240.

Engel, S. E. , and Granda, R. E. (1975). Guidelines for man/display interfaces (Tech. Report TR00.2720). Poughkeepsie, NY: IBM Corp.

Fisher, D. L. , Coury, B. G. , and Tengs, T. O. (1985). Optimizing the set of highlighted options on video display terminal menus. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (pp. 650–654). Santa Monica, CA; Human Factors Society.

Fisher, D. L., Coury, B. G., Tengs, T. 0., and Duffy, S. A. (in press). Minimizing the time to search visual displays. Human Factors.

Galitz, W. O. (1980). Human factors in office automation. Atlanta: Life Office Management Assn.

Gomberg, B. F. (1985). Strategic and attentional factors of computer-generated highlighting. Unpublished M.A. thesis, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM.

Huynh, H. , and Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69–82.

Jonides, J. (1980). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. In J. B. Long and A. D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187–203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Miller, L. A. , and Thomas, J. C. (1976). Behavioral issues in the use of interactive systems (Research Report RC 6326). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM Corp.

10.

Morse, A. (1979). Some principles for the effective display of data. Computer Graphics, 13, 94–101.

11.

Parrish, R. N. , Gates, J. L. , and Munger, S. J. (1981). Design guidelines and criteria for user/operator transactions with battlefield automated systems: Vol. IV. Provisional guidelines and criteria for the design of user/operator transactions. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

12.

Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618–660.

13.

Rayner, K. (1983). The perceptual span and eye movement control during reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 97–120). New York: Academic Press.

14.

Smith, S. L. , and Goodwin, N. C. (1971). Blink coding for information display. Human Factors, 13, 283–290.

15.

Smith, S. L. , and Goodwin, N. C. (1972). Another look at blinking displays. Human Factors, 14, 345–347.

16.

Stewart, T. F. M. (1976). Displays and the software interface. Applied Ergonomics, 7, 137–146.

17.

Tan, K. C. (1987). Highlighting parameters of computer-generated displays. Unpublished M.A. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.

18.

Treisman, A. M. , and Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.

19.

Tullis, T. S. (1983). The formatting of alphanumeric displays: A review and analysis. Human Factors, 25, 657–682.