Five experiments addressed the effects of intercomponent consistency on skill acquisition in a class of cognitively demanding tasks requiring rapid integration of information and rapid application of rules. The role of consistency of external stimulus-to-rule linkage in facilitating learning and performing rule-based tasks was examined. After extensive consistent practice, subjects' performance was remarkably similar to performance observed in traditional perceptual learning tasks. This similarity suggests that mechanisms underlying perceptual learning (in visual search) and rule-based spatial learning are similar. Subjects who were trained such that consistent stimulus-to-rule association could be built up and strengthened with practice performed in a manner qualitatively and quantitatively different from subjects trained with inconsistent stimulus-to-rule relationships. This superiority of the consistent stimulus-to-rule-trained subjects over the inconsistent stimulus-to-rule subjects was even more exaggerated in dual-task situations. The data have implications for the understanding and training of skilled problem-solving tasks. When training affords development of subcomponent automatization of the problem-solving activity, the chance of memory overload is reduced. The results suggest one such trainable subcomponent-the perceptual/rule-based components.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P. L. (1986). Individual differences in information processing: An investigation of intellectual abilities and task performance during practice. Intelligence, 10, 109–139.
2.
Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information-processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3–27.
3.
Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3, 111–149.
4.
Adams, J. A. (1987). Historical review and appraisal of research on the learning, retention, and transfer of human motor skills. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 41–47.
5.
Anzai, Y., and Simon, H. A. (1979). The theory of learning by doing. Psychological Review, 86, 124–140.
6.
Book, W. F. (1925). The psychology of skill. New York: Gregg.
7.
Briggs, G. E., and Johnsen, A. M. (1973). On the nature of central processes in choice reactions. Memory and Cognition, 1, 91–100.
8.
Bryan, W. L., and Harter, N. (1899). Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.
9.
Charness, N. (1979). Components of skill in bridge. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 33, 1–16.
10.
Chase, W. G., and Simon, H. A. (1973). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 29–46.
11.
Cleveland, A. A. (1907). The psychology of chess and learning to play it. American Journal of Psychology, 18, 269–308.
12.
de Groot, A. D. (1965). Thought and choice in chess. The Hague: Mouton.
13.
Egan, D., and Schwartz, B. (1979). Chunking in recall of symbolic drawings. Memory and Cognition, 7, 149–158.
14.
Elo, A. (1978). The rating of chessplayers, past and present. New York: Arco.
15.
Fisk, A. D.Ackerman, P. L., and Schneider, W. (1987). Automatic and controlled processing theory and its application to human factors problems. In P. A. Hancock (Ed.), Human factors psychology (pp. 159–197) Amsterdam: North-Holland.
16.
Fisk, A. D., and Schneider, W. (1983). Category and word search: Generalizing search principles to complex processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 177–195.
17.
Fisk, A. D.Schneider, W., and Logan, G. D. (1986). An examination of the characteristics of automatic and controlled human information processing. Unpublished manuscript, Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, Atlanta.
18.
Fitts, P. (1964). Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning (pp. 243–285). New York: Academic Press.
19.
Gibson, E. J. (1977). How perception really develops: A view from outside the network. In D. LaBerge and S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Perception and comprehension (pp. 155–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Holding, D. H. (1985). The psychology of chess skill. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21.
Jeffries, R.Turner, A.Polson, P., and Atwood, M. (1981). Processes involved in designing software. In J. R. Anderson (Ed.), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 111–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Kotovsky, K.Hayes, J. R., and Simon, H. A. (1985). Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 248–294.
23.
Kramer, A.Schneider, W.Fisk, A. D., and Donchin, E. (1986). The effects of practice and task structure on components of the event-related brain potential. Psychophysiology, 23, 33–47.
24.
Lasker, E. M. (1975). Lasker's manual of chess. New York: Dover.
25.
Logan, G. D. (1979). On the use of a concurrent memory load to measure attention and automaticity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 189–207.
26.
Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 367–386.
27.
McGeoch, J. A. (1927). The acquisition of skill. Psychological Bulletin, 24, 437–466.
28.
Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
29.
Parasuraman, R. (1985). Detection and identification of abnormalities in chest X-rays: Effects of reader skill, disease prevalence, and reporting standards. In R. E. Eberts and C. G. Eberts (Eds.), Trends in ergonomics! human factors II (pp. 59–66). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.
30.
Pear, T. H. (1927). Skill. Journal of Personnel Research, 5, 478–489.
31.
Posner, M. I., and Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32.
Rasmussen, J., and Jensen, A. (1974). Mental procedures in real-life tasks: A case study of electronic troubleshooting. Ergonomics, 17, 293–307.
33.
Reed, A. V. (1976). List length and the time course of recognition in immediate memory. Memory and Cognition, 4, 16–30.
34.
Reitman, J. (1976). Skilled perception in GO: Deducing memory structures from inter-response times. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 336–356.
35.
Saariluoma, P. (1984). Coding problem spaces in chess: A psychological study. Commentationes scientiarum socialium 23. Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish Society of Sciences and Letters.
36.
Saariluoma, P. (1985). Chess players' intake of task-relevant cues. Memory and Cognition, 13, 385–391.
37.
Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.
38.
Schneider, W. (1985). Training high-performance skills: Fallacies and guidelines. Human Factors, 27, 285–300.
39.
Schneider, W., and Fisk, A. D. (1982). Concurrent automatic and controlled visual search: Can processing occur without resource cost?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 261–278.
40.
Schneider, W., and Fisk, A. D. (1983). Attention theory and mechanisms for skilled performance. In R. A. Magill (Ed.), Memory and control of action (pp. 119-143). New York: North-Holland.
41.
Schneider, W., and Fisk, A. D. (1984). Automatic category search and its transferJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10, 1–15.
42.
Schneider, W., and Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
43.
Schneider, W.Vidulich, M., and Yeh, Y. Y. (1982). Training spatial skills for air-traffic control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 10–14). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
44.
Shiffrin, R. M., and Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
45.
Simon, H. A., and Barenfeid, M. (1969). Information-processing analysis of perceptual processes in problem solving. Psychological Review, 76, 475–483.
46.
Sloboda, J. A. (1976). Visual perception of musical notation: Registering pitch symbols in memory. Quarterly Journal of Psychology, 28, 1–16.
47.
Solomon, L., and Stein, G. (1896). Normal motor automatism. Psychological Review, 3, 492–512.
