Why Low-Flying Fighter Planes Crash: Perceptual and Attentional Factors in Collisions with the Ground

Abstract

A detailed analysis of a recent jet fighter mishap is made in terms of perceptual and attentional factors that may have contributed to or caused the mishap. The crash occurred in clear air while the fighter was maneuvering over rugged terrain of irregular and unpredictable features. There were no mechanical failures and no evidence of pilot error. The analysis concentrates on the effects of the underinformativeness of the terrain; the difficulties of perceiving distance, ground clearance, and position under these conditions; the consequences of the high gravitational forces generated by the jet just prior to impact; and the competition for the pilot's visual attention. The effects of the combinations of these various factors are then considered. Finally, specific suggestions are made for improvements in training for low-altitude flight.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Cutting, J. E. (1986). Perception with an eye for motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.

Haber, R. N. (1983). Stimulus information and processing mechanisms in visual space perception. In J. Beck , B. Hope , and A. Rosenfeld (Eds.). Human and machine vision (pp. 157–237). New York: Academic Press.

Haber, R. N. (1985). Toward a theory of the perceived spatial layout of scenes. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 6, 282–321.

Haber, R. N. (1986). Flight simulation. Scientific American, 255(1), 96–103.

Haber, R. N. (in preparation). Perceptual and attentional factors in low-altitude high-speed flight.

Haber, R. N. , and Hershenson, M. (1980). The psychology of visual perception (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hettinger, L. J. , Owen, D. H. , and Warren, R. (1983). The functional utility of optical flow acceleration as information for detecting loss in altitude. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Aviation Psychology. Columbus: Ohio State University Aviation Psychology Laboratory.

Hochberg, J. (1971). Perception. New York: Prentice-Hall.

10.

Leibowitz, H. W. , and Post, R. B. (1982). The two modes of processing concept and some implications. In J. Beck (Ed.). Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

11.

Life Sciences-United States Air Forces Safety Journal (various issues since 1980). Norton Air Force Base, CA: Directorate of Aerospace Safety, Life Sciences Division.

12.

McNaughton, G. B. (1981, July). Notes on human factors mishaps. Life Sciences-United States Air Force Safety Journal, 1–9.

13.

Miller, M. (1983). Low altitude training. Training Manual for the 162d Fighter Weapons School, Arizona Air National Guard, Tucson, Arizona.

14.

Owen, D. H. , Warren, R. , Jensen, R. S. , Mangold, S. J. , and Hettinger, L. J. (1981). Optical information for detecting loss in one's own forward speed. Acta Psychologica, 48, 203–213.

15.

Regan, D. , and Beverley, K. I. (1982). How do we avoid confounding the direction we are looking with the direction we are moving?? Science, 215, 194–196.

16.

Roscoe, S. (1980). Aviation psychology. Iowa City, IA: University of Iowa Press.

17.

Wiener, E. L. (1977). Controlled flight into terrain accidents: System-induced errors. Human Factors, 19, 171–181.

18.

Wolpert, L. , Owen, D. H. , and Warren, R. (1983). Eye-height-scaled versus ground-texture-unit-scaled metrics for the detection of loss in altitude. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Aviation Psychology (pp. 513–521). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Aviation Psychology Laboratory.