Temporal Resolution: An Insight into the Video Display Terminal (VDT) “Problem”

Abstract

Previous studies suggest that many of the discomforts associated with VDT use may be attributed to poor working conditions and to the task itself However, the relationship between visual complaints and specific display characteristics of the VDT is not entirely clear. This study investigated the effect of the temporal characteristics of VDT display luminance on temporal resolution of the visual system. Subjective ratings of visual discomfort and task performance were also considered. Ten individuals performed a visual search task for three hours at either a VDT display or back-projection display system. The only difference between these two displays was the temporal characteristics of display luminance. Environmental factors were equated for both conditions. Despite the similarity between conditions, temporal resolution decreased over time and individuals reported increased task difficulty, difficulty in concentrating, tired eyes, and the need to shut eyes more often for VDT use.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dainoff, M. J. (1984). Ergonomics of office automation-A conceptual overview. In Proceedings of the 1984 International Conference on Occupational Ergonomics (pp. 72–80). Toronto. Ontario, Canada: Human Factors Association of Canada.

Fellman, T. , Brauninger, U. , Gierer, R. , and Grandjean, E. (1982). An ergonomic evaluation of VDTs. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1, 69–80.

Gould, J. D. , and Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors, 26, 323–337.

Kalsbeek, J. W. H. , Posma, E. , Bosman, D. , and Umbach, F. W. (1983). How specific is VDT-induced visual fatigue?? Proceedings of the Society of Information Displays, 24, 63–65.

Läubli, T. , Hunting, W. , and Grandjean, E. (1981). Postural and visual loads at VDT workplaces II. Lighting conditions and visual impairments. Ergonomics, 24, 933–944.

Mikaelian, H. H. (1983). An initial investigation of the effects of video display units on fundamental processes: Temporal resolution. Unpublished manuscript, University of New Brunswick, Department of Psychology, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada.

Moray, N. (1982). Subjective mental workload. Human Factors, 24, 25–40.

Mourant, R. R. , Lakshmanan, R. , and Chantadisai, R. (1981). Visual fatigue and cathode ray tube display terminals. Human Factors, 23, 529–540.

Muter, P. , Latremouille, S. A. , Treurniet, W. C. , and Beam, P. (1982). Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors 24, 501–508.

10.

National Research Council . (1983). Video displays, work and vision. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

11.

Nilsson, T. H. , Richmond, C. F. , and Nelson, T. M. (1975). Flicker adaptation shows evidence of many visual channels selectively sensitive to temporal frequency. Vision Research, 15, 621–624.

12.

Nordqvist, T. , Ohlsson, K. , and Nilsson, L. G. (1986). Fatigue and reading of text on videotex. Human Factors, 28, 353–363.

13.

Ostberg, O. (1975). CRTs pose health problems for operators. Occupational Health and Safety, 44, 24–46.

14.

Starr, S. J. , Thompson, C. R. , and Shute, S. J. (1982). Effects of video display terminals. Human Factors, 24, 699–711.

15.

Stone, P. T. , Clarke, A. M. , and Slater, A.I. (1980). The effect of task contrast on visual performance and visual fatigue at a constant illuminance. Lighting Research and Technology, 12, 144–159.

16.

Turner, P. (1964). Critical flicker fusion frequency and its modification by a conditioning stimulus of flickering light. Journal of Physiology, 171, 6p–8p.