People read more slowly from CRT displays than from paper (see, for example, Gould and Grischkowsky, 1984). This report summarizes ten experiments and several more analyses that seek to explain the cause of this reading-speed difference. Typically, each experiment isolates one variable and studies whether it explains the difference. Results show that no one variable studied (e.g., experience in using CRT displays; display orientation; character size, font, or polarity) explains it. The tentative conclusion is that the difference is due to a combination of variables, probably centering on the image quality of the characters themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauer, D., and Cavonius, C. (1980). Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal. In E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (Eds.), Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals (pp. 137-142). London: Taylor and Francis.
2.
Brauninger, U., Grandjean, E., van der Heiden, G., Nishiyama, K., and Gierer, R. (1984). Lighting characteristics of VDT's from an ergonomic point of view. In E. Grandjean (Ed.), Ergonomics and health in modern offices (pp. 383-390). London: Taylor and Francis.
3.
Cushman, W. H. (1984). Reading from microfiche, from a VDT, and from the printed page; subjective fatigue and performance: A preliminary report. In E. Grandjean (Ed.), Ergonomics and health in modem offices (pp. 322-328). London: Taylor and Francis.
4.
Gould, J. D. (1968). Visual factors in the design of the computer-controlled CRT displays. Human Factors, 10, 359-376.
5.
Gould, J. D., Alfaro, L., Finn, R., Haupt, B., and Minuto, A. (in press). Reading from CRT displays can be as fast as reading from paper. Human Factors.
6.
Gould, J. D., and Grischkowsky, N. (1982). Doing the same work with a CRT terminal and with hardcopy. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 26th Annual Meeting (pp. 165-166). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
7.
Gould, J. D., and Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with hard copy and with cathode-ray tube (CRT) computer terminals. Human Factors, 26, 323-337.
8.
Gould, J. D., and Grischkowsky, N. (1986). Does visual angle affect reading speed?Human Factors, 28, 165-173.
9.
Gupta, S., Bantz, D., Sholtz, P., Evangelisti, C., and De Orazio, W. R. (1986). YODA: An advanced display for personal computers. (IBM Research Report RC-11618). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM.
10.
Heppner, F. H., Anderson, J. G. T., Farstrup, A. E., and Weiderman, N. H. (1985). Reading performance on a standardized test is better from print than from computer display. Journal of Reading, 28, 321-325.
11.
Kak, A. V. (1981). Relationships between readability of printed and CRT-displayed text. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 137-140). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
12.
Kruk, R. S., and Muter, P. (1984). Reading of continuous text on video screens. Human Factors, 26, 339-346.
13.
Kucera, H., and Francis, W. W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
14.
Levy, B. A. (1983). Proofreading familiar text: Constraints on visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 1-12.
15.
Lynch, G. (1985). American national standard for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations: A report to the society. In Proceedings or The Human Factors Society 29th Annual Meeting (p. 987). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
16.
Mills, C. B., and Weldon, L. J. (1984). Reading from computer screens (Tech. Report CAR-TR-94). College Park, MD: University of Maryland, Human/Computer Interaction Laboratory.
17.
Morrison, R. E., and Rayner, K. (1981). Saccade size in reading depends upon character spaces and not visual angle. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 395-396.
18.
Muter, P., Latremouille, S. A., Treuniet, W. C., and Beam, P. (1982). Extended readings of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors, 24, 501-508.
19.
Paterson, D. A., and Tinker, M. A. (1940). How to make Type readable. New York: Harper.
20.
Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 618-660.
21.
Sholtz, P. N. (1984). Making high-quality colored images on raster displays (IBM Research Report RC-9632). Yorktown Heights, NY: IBM.
22.
Secrest, D., and Dainoff, M. (1984). Performance changes resulting from ergonomic factors in VDT data-entry workstation design. In A. Mital (Ed.), Trends in ergonomics/human factors I (pp. 311-316). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
23.
Switchenko, D. (1984). Reading from CRT versus paper: The CRT-disadvantage hypothesis re-examined. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 28th Annual June 1987-299 Meeting (p. 429). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
24.
Tinker, M. A. (1957). Effect of curved text upon readability of print. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 218-221.
25.
Tinker, M. A. (1958). Recent studies of eye movements in reading. Psychological Bulletin, 55, 215-231.
26.
Tinker, M. A. (1963). Legibility of print. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press.
27.
Wright, P., and Lickorish, A. (1983). Proof-reading texts on screen and paper. Behaviour and Information Technology, 2(3), 227-235.
