Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Most lifting analyses have used static models to evaluate the loading of the trunk during the performance of work. Recent research has reported many differences in trunk muscle force capability when a wide range of trunk velocities are observed. This study focused upon these differences during slow trunk velocities, which would be expected during a lift. Forty-five subjects were tested for their ability to exert torque about their low back under static and dynamic sagittally symmetric lifting conditions. Trunk muscle electromyography was used as a measure of trunk loading. The results reveal that significantly greater loading occurs under slow dynamic conditions, as compared with static conditions. Hence, static models, which assume quasistatic motion, are not good indicators of dynamic trunk load. A regression model was developed that described trunk loading as a function of trunk angle and velocity. The correlation between torque and muscle electromyography in the erector spinae muscles was also found to increase significantly as trunk velocity increased. The implication of these findings upon lifting is discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andersson, G. J. (1981). Epidemiologic aspects of low back pain in industry. Spine, 6, 53–60.

Andersson, G. J. , Herberts, P. , and Ortengren, R. (1976). Myoelectric back muscle activity in standardized lifting postures. In P. V. Komi (Ed.), Biomechanics 5-A (pp. 520–529). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

Andersson, G. J. , Ortengren, R. , and Herberts, P. (1977). Quantitative electromyographic studies of back muscle activity related to body posture and loading. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 8, 85–96.

Basmajian, J. V. (1978). Muscles alive: Their functions revealed by electromyography. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

Bigland, B. , and Lippold, O. C. (1954). The relationship between force velocity and integrated electrical activity in human muscles. Journal of Physiology, 123, 214.

Cailliet, R. (1978). Low back pain syndrome (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.

Chaffin, D. B. , and Baker, W. H. (1970). A biomechanical model for analysis of symmetric sagittal plane lifting. AIIE Transactions, 2(1), 16–27.

Davis, P. (1979, May). Reducing the risk of industrial bad backs. Occupational Health and Safety, pp. 45–47.

Inman, V. T. , Ralstan, H. J. , Saunders, J. B. , Feinstein, B. , and Wright, E. N. (1952). Relation of human EMG to muscle tension. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 4, 187–194.

10.

Marras, W. S. , King, A. I. , and Joynt, R. L. (1984). Measurements of loads on the lumbar spine under isometric and isokinetic conditions. Spine. 9, 176–188.

11.

Marras, W. S. , and Wongsam, P. E. (1986). Flexibility and velocity of the normal and impaired lumbar spine. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 67, 213–17.

12.

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health . (1981). Work practices guide for manual lifting (Tech. Report No. 81–12). Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

13.

Schultz, A. B. , and Andersson, G. B. (1981). Analysis of the loads on the lumbar spine. Spine. 6, 76–82.

14.

Schultz, A. B. , Andersson, G. B. , Ortengren, R. , Nachemson, A. , and Haderspeck, K. (1982a). Loads on the lumbar spine: Validation of a biomechanical analysis by measurements of intradiscal pressures and myoelectric signals. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 64, 713–720.

15.

Schultz, A. B. , Andersson, G. B. , Haderspeck, K. H. , Ortengren, R. , Nordin, M. , and Bjork, R. (1982b). Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists. Journal of Biomechanics, 15, 669–675.

16.

Svensson, H. O. , and Andersson, G. B. (1983). Low back pain in 40 to 47 year old men: Work history and work environment factors. Spine, 8, 272–276.

Trunk Force Development during Static and Dynamic Lifts

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References