Simulation of the After-Reach Hazard on Power Presses Using Dual Palm Button Actuation

Abstract

This paper describes a study of the after-reach hazard when a power press simulator is used. The after-reach hazard occurs when a worker reaches into a point of operation on a power press after the press cycle has been initiated. The hand-reach speed of industrial workers was measured to quantify the after-reach hazard and to determine variables that may affect after-reach movements. Significant differences in hand speed were identified, which were based on the age and gender of the worker. The location of the dual palm buttons in relation to the point of operation also significantly affected hand speed. Male workers who were 30 years of age or younger demonstrated the fastest hand speed and thus appear more likely to sustain a traumatic injury due to the after-reach hazard. The results of this study are compared with current federal standards.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bendix Corporation . (1975). Machine guarding—assessment of need (DHEW Publication No. [NIOSH] 75–173). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Conover, W. J. (1980). Practical nonparametric statistics. New York: Wiley.

Draper, N. R. , and Smith, H. (1966). Applied Regression Analysis. New York: Wiley.

Knauss, P. (1974, June). Nachgreifsicherheit an Pressen der Metallbearbeitung [Guarding against after-reach on metalworking presses]. Die Berufsgenossenschaft, pp. 239–246.

Löbl, O. (1935). Über die Zveihandeinrückung an Exzenterpressen, Eine Untersuchung der Grenzen ihrer Schutzwirkung [On the two-hand insertion on eccentric presses, A study of the limits of the protective effect]. Reicharbeitsblatt III, No. 20, 150–154.

Masters, R. W. (1973). The location of two-hand trip devices on full revolution mechanical power presses with regard to operator safety. Unpublished master's thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

McCaffrey, D. P. (1981). Work-related amputations by type and prevalence. Monthly Labor Review, 104(3), 35–41.

Pizatella, T. J. , Etherton, J. R. , Jensen, R. C. , and Oppold, J. A. (1983). Investigation of the after-reach hazard in two-hand controlled power press operations. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 9, 194–200.

Trump, T. R. , and Etherton, J. R. (1986). Machine-cycling errors with foot switches in repetitive tasks. Applied Ergonomics, 17(3), 199–208.

10.

U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration . (1986). General industry, OSHA safety and health standards, 29 CFR 1910 (OSHA 2206. 1910.217, Mechanical Power Presses). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

11.

Van Ballegooijen, G. A. (1978). Messungen an Mensch-Maschine-Systemen unter Berücksichtigung der Nachgreifgefahr [Measurements on man-machine systems taking into consideration the danger of reflex grasping]. In Colloquium on Safety Technique, Man-Machine Environment II (paper no. 6, pp. 79–89). Mannheim: Berufsgenossenschaft nahrungsmittel und gaststatten.

12.

Welford, A. T. (1980). Relationships between reaction time and fatigue, stress, age and sex. In A. T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction times (pp. 321–354). New York: Academic Press.

13.

Wilco, Inc. (1976). Analysis of and design requirements for mechanical power press safeguarding systems (NTIS Accession Number PB86120557). Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service.

14.

Wüstenberg, D. (1970). Experimentelle Untersuchung des Sicherheitsgrades für das System “Bedienungsmann-exzenterpresse” [Experimental investigation of the degree of safety afforded in the system “operator-eccentric press”] (Arbeitswissenschaft und praxis, Vol. 11). Berlin: Beuth-Vertrieb GmbH.