Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

As the number of levels of a hierarchical menu structure grows, users find it difficult to navigate from their current location to their desired location. Despite the navigation problem, designers of menu interfaces may want to trade more depth for less breadth in order to take advantage of funneling. Indeed, Lee and MacGregor (1985) have presented an analysis of search time that suggests that the optimal number of options per menu panel over a wide range of conditions is in the range of only four to eight. However, Lee and MacGregor's analysis applies only to cases where the user cannot restrict the scope of search based on either experience with the menu panel or on the organization of the options on the panel. The analysis is extended to cases of restricted search. Assuming optimal grouping, the optimal number of alternatives on a single page ranges from 16 to 78 across the same parameter values explored by Lee and MacGregor.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderberg, M. R. (1973). Cluster analysis for applications. New York: Academic Press.

Card, S. K. (1982). User perceptual mechanisms in the search of computer command menus. In Proceedings of Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 190–196). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Card, S. K. , Moran, T. P. , and Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dumais, S. T. , and Landauer, T. (1983). Using examples to describe categories. In Proceedings of CHI '83 (pp. 112–115). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.

Kiger, J. I. (1984). The depth/breadth trade-off in the design of menu-driven user interfaces. International Journal of Mall-Machine Studies, 20, 201–213.

Lee, E. , and MacGregor, J. (1985). Minimizing user search time in menu retrieval systems. Human Factors, 27, 157–162.

Lee, E. S. , Whalen, T. , McEwen, S. , and Latrémouille, S. (1984). Optimizing the design of menu pages for information retrieval. Ergonomics, 27, 1051–1069.

McDonald, J. E. , Stone, J. D. , and Liebelt, L. (1983). Searching for items in menus: The effects of organization and type of target. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting (pp. 834–837). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

Miller, D. P. (1981). The depth/breadth tradeoff in hierarchical computer menus. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 296–300). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.

10.

Paap, K. R. , and Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. (in press). Design of menus. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

11.

Roske-Hofstrand, R. J. , and Paap, K. R. (1985). Cognitive network organization and cockpit automation. In Proceedings of the Third Symposiun on Aviation Psychology (pp. 71–78). Columbus, OH: Association of Aviation Psychologists.

12.

Schvaneveldt, R. , Durso, F. , and Dearholt, D. (1985). Pathfinder: Scaling with network structures (Memoranda in Computer and Cognitive Science # MCCS-9). Las Cruces, NM: New Mexico State University, Computing Research Laboratory.

13.

Snowberry, K. , Parkinson, S. R. , and Sisson, N. (1983). Computer display menus. Ergonomics, 26, 699–712.

The Optimal Number of Menu Options per Panel

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References