Subjects read continuous text for 80 min using microfiche and video display terminals (VDTs) with negative- and positive-appearing images and printed paper copy. Measurements of visual fatigue (ocular discomfort) and reading speed were obtained periodically, and a test of reading comprehension was given at the end of each session. Visual fatigue was significantly greater when subjects read from negative microfiche (light characters, dark background) projected on a metal screen or from the screen of a VDT with positive-appearing images (dark characters, light background). However, when subjects read from microfiche projected on a high-reflectance matte screen or from the screen of a VDT with negative images, visual fatigue was not significantly greater than that reported for the printed materials. Reading speeds tended to be slower for the negative image conditions. but reading comprehension scores were similar for all conditions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bauer, D., Bonacker, M., and Cavonius, C. R. (1983) Frame repetition rate for flicker-free viewing of bright VDU screens. Displays, 4, 31–33.
2.
Bauer, D., and Cavonius, C. R. (1980). Improving the legibility of visual display units through contrast reversal. In E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (Eds.). Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals (pp. 137-142).London: Taylor & Francis.
3.
Brown, B.S., Dismukes, K., and Rinalducci, E.J. (1982). Video display terminals and vision of workers: Summary and overview of a symposium. Behavior and Information Technology, 1, 121–140.
4.
Cakir, A., Hart, D.J., and Stewart, T. F. M. (1979). The VDT manual. Darmstadt, West Germany: Inca-Fiej Research Association.
5.
Carmichael, L., and Dearborn, W. F. (1947). Reading and visual fatigue. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
6.
Cushman, W. H. (1978). Visual search using microfiche: Effects of microfiche reader screen scintillation on visual fatigue, general fatigue, and performance. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 22nd Annual Meeting (pp. 299–302). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
7.
Dill, A. B., and Gould, J. D. (1970). Flickerless regeneration rates for CRT displays as a function of scan order and phosphor persistence. Human Factors. 12, 465–471.
8.
Flesch, R. (1949). The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Row.
9.
Gould, J. D., and Grischkowsky, N. (1984). Doing the same work with paper and cathode ray tube displays (CRT). In E. Grandjean (Ed.). Ergonomics and health in modern offices (pp. 329–338). London: Taylor & Francis.
10.
Grandjean, E. (Ed.). (1984). Ergonomics and health in modern offices. London: Taylor & Francis.
11.
Grimes, I. D. (1983). Effects of patterning on flicker frequency. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 27th Annual Meeting (pp. 46–50). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
12.
Gunnarsson, E., and Soderberg, I. (1983). Eye strain resulting from VDT work at the Swedish Telecommunications Administration. Applied Ergonomics, 14, 61–69.
13.
Gyr, S., Nishiyama, K., Gierer, R., Läubli. T., and Grandjean, E. (1984).The effects of various refresh rates in positive and negative displays (introductory paper). In E. Grandjean (Ed.), Ergonomics and health in modern offices (pp. 359–363). London; Taylor & Francis.
14.
Helander, M. G., Billingsley, P. A. and Schurick, J. M. (1984). An evaluation of human factors research on visual display terminals in the workplace. In F. Muckier(Ed.). Human factors review: 1984 (pp. 55–129). Santa Monica. CA: Human Factors Society.
15.
Judish, J. M. (1968). The effect of positive-negative microforms and front-rear projection on reading speed and comprehension. Journal of Micrographics (NMA), 2, 58–61.
16.
Kolers, P. A., Duchnicky, R. L., and Ferguson, D. C. (1981). Eye movement measurement of readability of CRT displays. Human Factors. 23. 517–527.
17.
Kruk, R. S., and Muter, P. (1984). Reading of continuous text on video screens. Human Factors. 26, 339–345.
18.
McVey, B. W., Clauer, C. K., and Taylor, S. E. (1984). A comparison of anti-glare contrast-enhancement filters for positive and negative image displays under adverse lighting conditions. In E. Grandjean (Ed.), Ergonomics and health in modern offices (pp. 405–409). London: Taylor & Francis.
19.
Muter: P., Latrémouille, S. A., Treurniet, W. C., and Beam, P. (1982). Extended reading of continuous text on television screens. Human Factors. 24, 501–508.
20.
National Research Council, Committee on Vision. (1983). Video displays, work, and vision. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21.
Pearson, R. G., and Byars, G. E. (1956). The development and validation of a checklist for measuring subjective fatigue (Report No. TR-56-115). San Antonio, TX: USAF School of Aviation Medicine.
22.
Radl, G. W. (1980). Experimental investigations for optimal presentation-mode and colours of symbols on the CRT-screen. In E. Grandjean and E. Vigliani (Eds.), Ergonomic aspects of visual display terminals (pp. 127–135). London: Taylor & Francis.
23.
Seppala, P. (1975). Visual fatigue in reading microforms. Agressologie, 16. 147–150.
24.
Spencer, H., and Reynolds, L. (1976). Factors affecting the acceptability of microforms as a reading medium. London: Royal College of Art, Readability of Print Research Unit.
25.
Taylor, S. E., and McVey, B. W. (1984). The dynamics of dark focus and accommodation to dark and light character CRT displays. In E. Grandjean (Ed.). Ergonomics and health in modern offices (pp. 248–253). London; Tavlor & Francis.
26.
Trade Cooperative Association. (1980). Safety regulations for display workplaces in the office sector (Report No. ZH 1/618, 10/80 edn.). Hamburg. W. Germany: Author.
27.
Turnage, R. E. (1966, May/June). The perception of flicker in cathode ray tube displays. Information Display, pp. 38–52.
28.
Zwahlen, H. T. (1984). Pupillary responses when viewing designated locations in a VDT workstation. In E. Grandjean (Ed.), Ergonomics and health ill modern of fices (pp. 339–345). London: Taylor & Francis.
