The Effect of Job Experience on the Maintenance Proficiency of Army Automotive Mechanics

Abstract

The proficiency of 70 Army automotive mechanics in performing two repair tasks was examined under controlled test conditions. The tasks were installation of a generator and a starter on a tank engine. The subjects were assigned to one of 10 job-experience (JE) categories based on the number of times they had performed the repair tasks. The 10 experience categories ranged from no previous experience to nine or more times. Six dimensions of maintenance proficiency were measured: quality checks, adherence to procedures, repair time, information use, tool selection, and tool use. Overall, proficiency improved markedly for mechanics in the 0 to 5 JE range, peaked between 5 and 6 JE, and declined somewhat for mechanics with more than 6 JE. The job-experience/proficiency function was similar for both repair tasks and all six dimensions of proficiency. The results indicate that job experience could be a valid predictor of maintenance proficiency and training needs if based on an analysis of a larger sample of representative maintenance tasks and validated with a larger subject population.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Department of the Army (1981). Organizational maintenance. Tank, combat, full-tracked, 105-mm gun, M60AI (Rise) (TM 9–2350–257–20–1–3). Washington, DC: Author.

Hagman, J. D. , and Rose, A. M. (1983). Retention of military tasks: A review. Human Factors, 25, 199–214.

Harper, W. R. (1982). Maintenance performance systems (organizational). Training materials for organizational maintenance tasks on M60AIIMII3AI equipment (Tech. Report 465–23). Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.

Harris, D. H. (1983). Maintenance performance systems (organizational). Description of components and operation (Tech. Report 465–34). Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences, Inc.

Hearst, E. (Ed.). (1979). The first century of experimental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Kern. R. P., and Hayes, J. F. (in press). Research findings to aid supen1isors and trainers in improving maintenance performance. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Mackintosh, N. J. (1974). The psychology of animal learning. New York: Academic Press.

Schurman, D. L. , and Porsche, A. J. (1980). Mean frequency for types of information-seeking or error events occurring under each type of task conditions (Tech. Report 82–11). Valencia, PA: Applied Science Associates, Inc.

Smith, J. P. (1964). The performance of organized maintenance by track vehicle mechanics and maintenance sergeants (Tech. Report 87). Fort Knox, KY: Human Resources Research Office.

10.

Spiker, V. A. (1982). Maintenance performance systems (organizational). Test administrator's guide for MOS 63N maintenance proficiency test (Technical Report 465–22). Santa Barbara, CA: Anacapa Sciences. Inc.

11.

Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.