This paper examines the experimental data on 11 abbreviation techniques for use with computer systems. The techniques include abbreviations based on intuition, abbreviations derived from formal rules, and military abbreviations. Although the comparison of user performance on the abbreviations produced by these different techniques is complicated by the varying conditions under which they were tested, trends in the data are apparent. This paper presents design recommendations based on this evidence as well as conjecture on how to further improve operator performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barrett, J. A., and Grems, M. (1960). Abbreviating words systematically. Communications of the ACM, 3, 323–324.
2.
Benbasat, I., and Wand, Y. (1984). Command abbreviation behavior in human-computer interaction. Communications of the ACM, 27, 376–383.
3.
Bourne, C. P., and Ford, D. F. (1961). A study of methods for systematically abbreviating English words and names. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 8, 538–552.
4.
Ehrenreich, S. L., and Porcu, T. A. (1982). Abbreviations for automated systems: Teaching operators the rules. In A. Badre and B. Schneiderman (Eds.), Directions in human-computer interaction (pp. 111–135). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5.
Hirsch-Pasek, K., Nudelman, S., and Schneider, M. L. (1982). An experimental evaluation of abbreviation schemes in limited lexicons. Behaviour and Information Technology, 1, 359–369.
6.
Hodge, M. H., and Pennington, F. M. (1973). Some studies of word abbreviation behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 98, 350–361.
7.
Kucera, H., and Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
8.
McBride, D. K., Lambert, J. V., and Lane, N. E. (1981, April). The development of a standardized abbreviation algorithm (ABBREV). Paper presented at the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, New York, NY.
9.
Moses, F. L., and Ehrenreich, S. L. (1981). Abbreviations for automated systems. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 25th Annual Meeting (pp. 132–135). Santa Monica. CA: Human Factors Society.
10.
Moses, F. L., Mendez. C. H., and Ehrenreich. S. L. (1980, September). The effect of learning and context on abbreviation intelligibility. Paper presented at the 88th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, Canada.
11.
Moses, F. L., and Potash, L. M. (1979, August). Assessment of abbreviation methods for automated tactical systems (Technical Report 398). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD A077 840)
12.
Nawrocki, L. H. (1979, June). Word abbreviations in man-computer communications systems (Working Paper HF 74–04). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
13.
Rogers, W. H., and Moeller, G. (1984). Comparison of abbreviation methods: Measures of preference and decoding performance. Human Factors, 26, 49–59.
14.
Streeter, L. A., Ackroff, J. M., and Taylor, G. A. (1983). On abbreviating command names. The Bell System Technical Journal, 62(6), Part 3. 1807–1828.
