Synthesized Speech Rate and Pitch Effects on Intelligibility of Warning Messages for Pilots

Abstract

In civilian and military operations, a future threat warning system with a voice display could warn pilots of other traffic, obstacles in the flight path, and/or terrain during low altitude helicopter flights. The present study was conducted to learn whether speech rate and voice pitch of “phoneme” synthesized speech affects pilots' accuracy and response time to typical threat warning messages. Helicopter pilots engaged in an attention-demanding “flying” task and listened for voice threat warnings presented in a background of simulated helicopter cockpit noise. Performance was measured by flying task performance, threat warning intelligibility, and response time to threat warnings. Pilot ratings were elicited for the different voice pitches and speech rates. Significant effects were obtained only for response time to messages and for pilot ratings, both as a function of speech rate. For the few cases when pilots forgot to respond to a voice message, they remembered 90% of the messages accurately when queried for their response 8 to 10 s later.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brokx, J. P. L. , and Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). Intonation and the perception of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23–36.

Cole, R. A. , and Jakimik, J. (1980). A model of speech perception. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Hart, S. G. , and Simpson, C. A. (1976, May). Effects of linguistic redundancy on synthesized cockpit warning message comprehension and concurrent time estimation. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference on Manual Control (NASA TMX-73170). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.

Larkey, L. S., and Danly, M. (1983, November). Fundamental frequency and the comprehension of simple and complex sentences. Paper presented at the 106th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Diego, CA.

Lisker, L. , and Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustic measurements. Word, 20, 384–422.

Miller, G. A. , and Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.

Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. , and Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957).The measurement of meaning. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

Simpson, C. A. (1976, May). Effects of linguistic redundancy on pilots' comprehension of synthesized speech. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Conference on Manual Control (NASA TMX-73170). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.

Simpson, C. A. (1980, October). Synthesized voice approach callouts for air transport operations (NASA Contractor Report NASA CR-3300). Moffett Field, CA: NASA-Ames Research Center.

10.

Simpson, C. A. , and Williams, D. H. (1980). Response time effects of alerting tone and semantic context for synthesized voice cockpit warnings. Human Factors, 22, 319–320.

11.

Sorenson, J. M. , and Cooper, W. E. (1980). Syntactic coding of fundamental frequency in speech production. In R. A. Cole (Ed.), Perception and production of fluent speech. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

12.

Summerfield, Q. (1982). Differences between spectral dependencies in auditory and phonetic temporal processing: Relevance to the perception of voicing in initial stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 72, 51–61.

13.

Williams, D. H. , and Simpson, C. A. (1976, October). A Systematic approach to advanced cockpit warning systems for air transport operations: Line pilot preferences. In Proceedings of the Aircraft Safety and Operating Problems Conference (NASA Special Publication NASA SP-416). Hampton, VA: NASA-Langley Research Center.