A Field Trial of Attention and Search Conspicuity

Abstract

Conspicuity might be defined as the property of an object that causes it to attract attention or to be readily located by search. It is often regarded as an attribute of the target object, but the state of attention of the observer is a factor that cannot be ignored. In this paper we define two kinds of conspicuity, attention conspicuity and search conspicuity. Attention conspicuity refers to the capacity of the object to attract attention when it is unexpected. Search conspicuity is the property of the object that enables it to be quickly and reliably located by search. A field trial was conducted to provide measures of these two kinds of conspicuity. Two groups of subjects were required to drive along a defined route on which disc targets were placed; one group was simply asked to report what attracted attention and the other was to search for and report the disc targets. The frequency with which the discs were reported was taken as a measure of conspicuity. The two kinds of conspicuity were found to be related in a systematic way. It was found that conspicuity was not strongly dependent on either object reflectance or size. An important determinant was the angle at which the object was displaced away from the line of sight.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Armour, M. (1976). The reaction time of drivers to roadside objects (Report No. AIR 217-2). Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board.

Baker, C. A. , Morris, D. F. , and Stedman, W. C. (1960). Target recognition on complex displays. Human Factors, 2, 51–61.

Cole, B. L. , and Jenkins, S. E. (1978). Conspicuity of traffic control devices. (Report No. AIR 218-1). Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board.

Cole, B. L. , and Jenkins, S. E. (1979). The effect of size and luminance on visual conspicuity in the road traffic environment (Report No. AIR 218-3). Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board.

Cole, B. L. , and Jenkins, S. E. (1980). The nature and measurement of conspicuity. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, 10(4), 99–107.

Cole, B. L. , and Jenkins, S. E. (1984). The effect of variability of background elements on the conspicuity of objects. Vision Research, 24, 261–270.

Engel, F. L. (1971). Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus. Vision Research, 11, 563–576.

Engel, F. L. (1974). Visual conspicuity and selective background interference in eccentric vision. Vision Research, 14, 459–471.

Engel, F. L. (1977). Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye. Vision Research, 17, 95–108.

10.

Forbes, T. W. (1939). A method for analysis of the effectiveness of highway signs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 23, 669–684.

11.

Forbes, T. W. , Fry, J. P. , Joyce, R. P. , and Pain, R. F. (1968). Letter and sign contrast, brightness and size effects on visibility. Highway Research Record, 216, 48–54.

12.

Forbes, T. W. , Pain, R. F. , Fry, J. P. , and Joyce, R. P. (1967). Effect of sign position and brightness on seeing simulated highway signs. Highway Research Record, 164, 29–37.

13.

Forbes, T. W. , Pain, R. F. , Joyce, R. P. , and Fry, J. P. (1968). Colour and brightness factors in simulated and full scale traffic sign visibility. Highway Research Record, 216, 55–65.

14.

Gerathewohl, S. J. (1953). Conspicuity of steady and flashing light signals: Variation of contrast. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 43, 567–571.

15.

Gerathewohl, S. J. (1957). Conspicuity of flashing light signals: Effects of variation among frequency, duration and contrast of the signals. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 47, 27–29.

16.

Jenkins, S. E. (1982). Consideration of the effects of background on sign conspicuity. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, 11(5), 182–205.

17.

Jenkins, S. E. , and Cole, B. L. (1979). A note on the role of colour in conspicuity (Report No. AIR 218-4). Melbourne: Australian Road Research Board.

18.

Jenkins, S. E. , and Cole, B. L. (1982). The effect of the density of background elements on the conspicuity of objects. Vision Research, 22, 1241–1252.

19.

Johansson, G. , and Backlund, F. (1970). Drivers and road signs. Ergonomics, 13, 749–759.

20.

Johansson, G. , and Rumar, K. (1966). Drivers and road signs: A preliminary investigation of the capacity of car drivers to get information from road signs. Ergonomics, 9, 57–62.

21.

Lee, P. N. J. , and Triggs, T. J. (1976). The effects of driving demand and roadway environment on peripheral visual detections. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, 8(5), 7–12.

22.

Macdonald, W. A. , and Hoffman, E. R. (1972). Factors affecting the design of road pavement messages. Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, 6(3), 273–285.

23.

Mace, D. J. , Perchonok, K. , and Pollack, L. (1981). Luminous requirements for traffic signs: The dimensions and importance of visual complexity (Rep. No. FHWARD). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, Offices of Research and Development, Federal Highway Administration.

24.

Melbourne Metropolitan Board of Works. (1981). Melbourne and Metropolitan Planning Scheme, Amendment 150. Melbourne: Author.

25.

Odeschalchi, P. (1960). Conspicuity of signs in rural surroundings. Traffic Engineering and Control, 2, 390–393, 397.

26.

Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933.

27.

Standards Association of Australia . (1975). Manual of uniform traffic control devices. Part 1. Description and use of elemental traffic control devices (AS1742). Sydney: Author.

28.

Standards Association of Australia , (1978). Manual of uniform traffic control devices. Part 2. Application of traffic control devices to traffic situations (AS1742). Sydney: Author.

29.

Webster's new international dictionary of the English language (3rd cd.). (1964). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster.