Vigilance and Task Load: In Search of the Inverted U

Abstract

The "Inverted-U Hypothesis" states that for a given task, there is an optimal level of workload or demand that yields the highest level of performance. A departure in either direction will result in a monotonically lower performance level, hence an inverted-U-shaped relationship between task demand and quality of performance. Most studies to date have failed to demonstrate the left-hand branch of the curve, that is, the regime in which performance presumably rises as load increases. The purpose of this study was to explore whether lowlevel additional demand on the monitor would result in improved performance.

Four groups of subjects performed a visual monitoring task for 48 min, then two of the four groups were given additional tasks, and a third had potentially distracting information on its display. Results indicated that the two groups with additional demand detected more signals than did the control group or the control-plus-distraction group. There were no significant differences in false alarms.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bexton, W. H. , Heron, W. , and Scott, T. H. (1954). Effects of decreased variation in the sensory environment. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 8, 70–76.

Hebb, D. C. (1955). Drives and the C.N.S. (conceptual nervous system). Psychological Review, 62, 243–254.

Jerison, H. J. , and Wallis, R. A. (1957). Experiments on vigilance, II: One-clock and three-clock monitoring (USAF WADC tech. rep. No. 57-206). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Wright Air Development Division. (AD 118171).

McGrath, J. J. Irrelevant stimulation and vigilance performance. (1963). In D. N. Buckner and J. J. McGrath (Eds.), Vigilance: A symposium. New York: McGraw-Hill.

McGrath, J. J. (1965). Performance sharing in an audiovisual vigilance task. Human Factors, 7, 141–153.

Pope, L. T. (1962, August). Attention level and visual and auditory monitoring performance (Technical Documentary Report No. MRL-TDR-62-97). Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Aeromedical Research Laboratory.

Poulton, E. C. (1960). The optimal perceptual load in a paced auditory inspection task. British Journal of Psychology, 51, 127–139.

Poulton, E. C. (1966). Engineering psychology. In P. Farnsworth , O. McNemar , and Q. McNemar (Eds.), Annual review of psychology. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.

Smith, R. L. , Lucaccini, L. F. , Groth, H. , and Lyman, J. (1966). Effects of anticipatory alerting signals and a compatible secondary task on vigilance performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 240–246.

10.

Wiener, E. L. (1964). Multiple channel monitoring. Ergonomics, 7, 453–460.

11.

Wiener, E. L. (1973). Adaptive measurement of vigilance decrement. Ergonomics, 16, 353–363.

12.

Wiener, E. L. (1975). On simultaneous monitoring and tracking. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 100–105.

13.

Wiener, E. L. , and Curry, R. E. (1980). Flight-deck automation: Promises and problems. Ergonomics, 23, 995–1011.

14.

Wiener, E. L. , Poock, G. K. , and Steele, M. (1964). The effect of time-sharing on monitoring performance: Simple mental arithmetic as a loading task. Perceptual Motor Skills, 19, 435–440.