Deciding the Existence of a Time-Sharing Ability: A Combined Methodological and Theoretical Approach

Abstract

Experimental and statistical methods for examining individual differences in dual-task performance and time-sharing ability are reviewed and criticized. Previous data and analysis procedures are generally inadequate to evaluate a time-sharing ability. Errors resulting from unsophisticated use of correlational and factor analytic procedures are described. Four previous studies that concern time-sharing are considered in detail. The nature of task selection, scoring methods, and control of practice and reliability issues are discussed. Based on a reanalysis of available data, a time-sharing ability is not rejected. Simulation, incorporation of theory in planning models, and crucial tests of the hypotheses are proposed as methods for assessing the time-sharing ability.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ackerman, P. L. , Schneider, W. , and Wickens, C. D. Individual differences in time-sharing ability: A critical review and analysis (Report No. 8102). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Human Attention Research Laboratory, March, 1982.

Ackerman, P. L. , and Wickens, C. W. Methodology and the use of dual and complex task paradigms in human factors research. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1982.

Cohen, J. , and Cohen P. Applied multivariate regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.

Damos, D. L. , and Smist, T. E. Individual differences in dual task performance (Monograph No.6). New Orleans, LA: Naval Biodynamics Laboratory, June, 1980.

Ekstrom, R. B. , French, J. W. , and Harman, H. H. An attempt to confirm five recently identified cognitive factors (Report No.8). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service, June, 1975.

Harman, H. H. Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago, 1976.

Hawkins, H. L. , Rodriguez, E. , and Reicher, G. M. Is timesharing a general ability? (Tech. Report No.3). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, Center for Cognitive and Perceptual Research, June, 1979.

Humphreys, L. G. The construct of general intelligence. Intelligence, 1979, 3, 105–120.

Humphreys, L. G. , Ilgen, D. , McGrath, D. , and Montanelli, R. Capitalization on chance in rotation of factors. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 259–271.

10.

Jennings, A. E. , and Chiles, W. D. An investigation of timesharing ability as a factor in complex performance. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 535–547.

11.

Kahneman, D. Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.

12.

Linn, R. L. A Monte Carlo approach to the number of factors problem. Psychometrika, 1968, 33, 37–71.

13.

Meredith, W. On weighted procrustes and hyperplane fitting in factor analytic rotation. Psychometrika, 1977, 42, 491–522.

14.

Mulaik, S. A. The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.

15.

Navon, D. , and Gopher, D. On the economy of the human processing system. Psychological Review, 1979, 86, 214–255.

16.

Sverko, B. Individual differences in time-sharing performance (Tech. Report No. ARL-77-4/AFOSR-77-4). Savoy, IL: University of Illinois, Aviation Research Laboratory, January, 1977.

17.

Welford, A. T. Mental workload as a function of demand, capacity, strategy and skill. Ergonomics, 1978, 21, 157–167.

18.

Wickens, C. D. The structure of attentional resources. In R. S. Nickerson (Ed.), Attention and performance VII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980.

19.

Wickens, C. D. , Mountford, S. J. , and Schreiner, W. Task dependent differences and individual differences in dual task performance (Tech. Report No. EPL-79-4/NAMRL-79-1). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Engineering Research Laboratory, July, 1979.

20.

Wickens, C. D. , Mountford, S. J. , and Schreiner, W. Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual differences in time-sharing. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 211–229.