Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Ohio state highway patrolmen and drivers completed two separate questionnaires designed to assess problems related to driver behavior in road construction and maintenance (C&M) zones. The highway patrolmen saw driver inattention, excessive speed, and improper driver behaviors as major causes of accidents in C&M zones and stated that most problems occur in the taper area of lane closures. Patrolmen considered rear-end collisions to be the most typical accident in these zones. The driver questionnaire revealed that when making decisions about speed and lane changes in C&M zones, most drivers rely on their own judgment and cues from other vehicles rather than on signing. Implications of the findings for the design and placement of traffic control devices in C&M zones are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bates, L.

State tests show arrow boards are effective "de-congesters."

Rural and Urban Roads, 1976, January, 34–35.

Dewar, R. E. , Ells, J. C. , and Mundy, G. Reaction time as an index of traffic sign perception. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 381–392.

Doege, T. C. , and Levy, P. S. Crash rates and construction on a toll highway. Paper presented at the 25th Annual EIS Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, April, 1976.

Dorsey, W. Variable message signing for traffic surveillance and control. State of the Art Report. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, January, 1977.

Graham, J. L. , Paulsen, R. J. , and Glennon, J. C. Accident and speed studies in construction zones (FHWA-RD 77-80). Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, June, 1977.

Humphreys, J. , Maulden, H. , and Sullivan, T. Identification of traffic management problems in work zones. Comments prepared for the FCP Conference. Project 1-Y, Columbus, Ohio, November 8, 1977 Contract No. DOT-FH-11-9368. (NTIS No. PB 80139520, 1978)

Lisle, F. N. , Reilly, B. J. , and Beale, M. C. Evaluation of timber barricades and precast concrete traffic barriers for use in highway construction areas (VHTRC 77-R13). Charlottesville, VA: Virginia Highway and Transportation Research Council, September, 1976.

McGee, H. , Moore, W. , Knapp, B. G. , and Sanders, J. Decision sight distance for highway design and traffic control requirements. Falls Church, VA: Biotechnology, Inc., 1978.

Nemeth, Z. A. , and Migletz, D. J. Accident characteristics before, during and after safety upgrading construction projects on Ohio's rural freeways. Transportation Research Board Record 1977, (672), June, 19–24.

10.

Rockwell, T. H. , and Miller, R. S. Risk behavior in driving (SAE Report No. 800334). Paper published as part of the Technical Paper Series, The Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., 1980.

11.

Rockwell, T. H. , and Nemeth, Z. A. Development of a driver based method of evaluation of traffic control at construction sites. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, October, 1981.

12.

U.S. Department of Transportation . Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, 1978.

Two Views of Motorist Behavior in Rural Freeway Construction and Maintenance Zones: The Driver and the State Highway Patrolman

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References