Individual Differences in Multiple-Task Performance as a Function of Response Strategy

Abstract

This experiment demonstrates that the response strategies used to perform a discrete task combination reflect individual differences in multiple- but not single-task information processing. Subjects performed a discrete task combination on two consecutive days. On Day 1, the strategy was identified as a simultaneous, an alternating, or a massed response strategy. On Day 2, some of the subjects were asked to change strategy. Comparisons among subjects using the same strategy on Day 2 indicate that subjects who use the massed response strategy naturally do not perform as well under multiple-task conditions as do the other subjects, although their single-task performance is not significantly poorer. Subsequent analyses revealed that massed response subjects may have poorer time-sharing skills than other subjects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Binet, A. La concurrence des %etats psychologiques. Revue Philosophique de la France et L'etranger, 1890, 29, 138–155.

Damos, D. L. Residual attention as a predictor of pilot performance. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 435–440.

Damos, D. L. and Lintern, G. A comparison of single- and dual-task measures to predict simulator performance of beginning student pilots. Ergonomics, 1981, 24, 673–684.

Damos, D. , and Smist, T. Individual differences in dualtask performance. Amherst, NY: Department of Industrial Engineering, State University of New York at Buffalo, June, 1980.

Damos, D. , and Wickens, C. The identification and transfer of timesharing skills. Acta Psychologica, 1980, 46, 15–39.

Dixon, W. , and Brown, M. (Eds.) Biomedical Computer Programs P-Series. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1979.

Hawkins, H. , Olbrich-Rodriquez, E. , Halloran, T. , Ketchum, R. , Bachmann, D. , and Reicher, G. Preparation cost and dual-task performance: Further evidence against a general time-sharing factor. Eugene, OR: Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, August, 1979.

Hawkins, H. , Rodriquez, E. and Reicher, G. Is time-sharing a general ability? Eugene, OR: Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, 1979.

Jennings, A. E. and Chiles, W. D. An investigation of timesharing ability as a factor in complex performance. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 535–548.

10.

Kirk, R. Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1968.

11.

McQueen, E. N. The distribution of attention. British Journal of Psychology, 1917, II (Monograph Supplements 5).

12.

North, R. A. and Gopher, D. Measures of attention as predictors of flight performance. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 1–14.

13.

Sharp, S. E. Individual psychology: A study in psychological method. The American Journal of Psychology, 1899, 10, 329–391.

14.

Sverko, B. Individual differences in timesharing performance. Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Institute of Aviation, Aviation Research Laboratory, RT ARL-77-4/AFOSR-77-4, January, 1977.

15.

Wickens, C. , Mountford, S. and Schreiner, W. Multiple resources, task-hemispheric integrity, and individual difference in time-sharing. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 211–230.