Thirteen experiments conducted or sponsored by the Army Research Institute are reviewed. For the most part, these experiments have examined retention of military tasks performed in an operational environment. They provide empirical data on the effects of method, task, and ability variables that influence attempts to improve retention through training. These data provide information useful to trainers and training-program developers in deciding how, what, and whom to train to enhance retention and achieve greater training management effectiveness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baldwin, R. D., Cliborn, R. E., and Foskett, R. J.The acquisition and retention of visual aircraft recognition skills. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 76-A4, November, 1976.
2.
Dressel, J. D.Mnemonically enhanced training. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Working Paper, February, 1980.
3.
Goldberg, S. L., Drillings, M., and Dressel, J. D.Mastery training: Effects on skill retention. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 513, March, 1981.
4.
Hagman, J. D.Effects of presentation- and test-trial training on motor acquisition and retention. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 431, January, 1980. (a)
5.
Hagman, J. D.Effects of training task repetition on retention and transfer of maintenance skill. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Report 1271, May, 1980. (b)
6.
Hagman, J. D.Effects of training schedule and equipment variety on retention and transfer of maintenance skill. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Report 1309, November, 1980. (c)
7.
Hagman, J. D.Effects of presentation- and test-trial training on acquisition and retention of movement end-location. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 492, November, 1980. (d)
8.
Hagman, J. D. and Schendel, J. D.Effects of refresher training on job-task typewriting performance. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1981, 11, 91. (Ms. No. 2391)
9.
Holmgren, J. E., Hilligoss, R. E., Swezey, R. W., and Eakins, R. C.Training effectiveness and retention of training extension course (TEC) instruction in the combat arms. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Report 1208, April, 1979.
10.
Johnson, S. L.Effects of training device on retention and transfer of a procedural task. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 257–272.
11.
Osborn, W. C., Campbell, C. H., and Harris, J. H.The retention of tank crewman skills. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Report 1234, December, 1979.
12.
Schendel, J. D. and Hagman, J. D.On sustaining procedural skills over prolonged retention intervals. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Technical Report 1298, July, 1980.
13.
Schendel, J. D., Shields, J. L., and Katz, M. S.Retention of motor skills: Review. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 1980, 10, 21. (Ms. No. 2016)
14.
Shields, J. L., Goldberg, S. L., and Dressel, J. D.Retention of basic soldiering skills. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Research Report 1225, September, 1979.
15.
Vineberg, R.A study of the retention of skills and knowledge acquired in basic training. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Organization, Technical Report 75–10, June, 1975.