Evaluation of 20 Workload Measures Using a Psychomotor Task in a Moving-Base Aircraft Simulator

Abstract

The sensitivity and intrusion of 20 pilot workload assessment techniques were compared using a psychomotor loading task in a three degree-of-freedom moving-base aircraft simulator. The primary task was an instrument landing system approach and landing, with measures taken between the outer and middle markers. Three levels of psychomotor load were obtained by combined manipulation of random wind-gust disturbance level and pitch stability. Two rating scale measures and one control movement measure demonstrated sensitivity to all levels of load. Additionally, one time estimation measure and one pulse rate measure demonstrated sensitivity to some levels of load. No intrusion was found. The results of this experiment indicate that the sensitivities of workload estimation techniques vary widely, and that only a few techniques appear sensitive to psychomotor load.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bowker, A. H. , and Lieberman, G. J. Engineering statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1959.

Connor, S. A. A comparison of pilot workload assessment techniques using a psychomotor task in a moving-base aircraft simulator. Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, October, 1981.

Cooper, G. E. , and Harper, R. P., Jr. The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. Moffett Field, CA. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, NASA Report TN-D-5153, April, 1969.

Donnell, M. L. The application of decision-analytic techniques to the test and evaluation phase of the acquisition of a major air system: Phase III. McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs Technical Report TR 79-6-91, May, 1979.

Donnell, M. L., and O'Connor, M. F. The application of decision analytic techniques to the test and evaluation phase of the acquisition of a major air system: Phase II, McLean, VA: Decisions and Designs Technical Report TR 78-3-35, April, 1978.

Hart, S. G. Time estimation as a secondary task to measure workload-attention sharing effect on operator performance. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Manual Control, NASA-Ames Research Center, May 21-23, 1975. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, Report No. NASA TMX-62 464, 1975, 64-77.

Hart, S. G. Pilot workload during final approach in congested airspace. Proceedings of the 1978 IEEE Conference On Decision and Control. New York: IEEE, 1979.

Hicks, T. G. , and Wierwille, W. W. Comparison of five mental workload assessment procedures in a movingbase driving simulator. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 129-143.

Kahneman, D. , Tursky, B. , Shapiro, D. , and Crider, A. Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969, 79, 164-167.

10.

Schiflett, S. G. , and Loikith, G. J. Voice stress as a measure of operator work-load. Patuxent River, MD: Naval Air Test Center, Technical Memorandum TM 79-3 SY, December 31, 1979.

11.

Sternberg, S , High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 1966, 153, 652-654.

12.

Wierwille, W. W. , and Williges, R. C. Survey and analysis of operator workload assessment techniques. Blacksburg, VA: Systemetrics, Inc. Report No. S-78-101, September, 1978.

13.

Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design, (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hili, 1971.