Driving Experience and Task Demands in Simulator and Instrumented Car: A Validation Study

Abstract

The validity of research results obtained using the fixed-base vehicle simulator of the Institute for Perception TNO was studied during straight-road driving. Absolute and relative validities were mainly evaluated in terms of system performance and driver behavior for inexperienced and experienced drivers, who had to perform lateral and longitudinal vehicle control both in the simulator and in an instrumented car on the road. Task demands for each control were varied with a free and forced accuracy instruction. Overall results showed good absolute and relative validity for longitudinal vehicle control; lateral vehicle control offered good relative validity. Lateral control performance lacked absolute validity due to the drivers' diminished perception of lateral translations (absence of kinesthetic feedback). Drivers were easily able to perceive yaw rotations in the simulator. Performance in the simulator was a more sensitive discriminator of driving experience than was performance in the instrumented car on the road.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen, R. W. , Klein, R. H. , and Ziedman, K. Automobile research simulators: A review and new approaches. Transportation Research Record, 1979, 706, 9–15.

Blaauw, G. J. Simulatie en wegontwerp (Simulation and road design). Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception TNO, Report IZF 1979-C21, 1979.

Blaauw, G. J. , and Burrij, S. ICARUS: An instrumented car for road user studies. Journal A, 1980, 21 (3), 134–138.

Blaauw, G. I. , Godthelp, J. , and Moraal, J. Driver's lateral control strategy as affected by task demands and driving experience. SAE Paper No. 770876, Detroit, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers, 1977.

Blaauw, G. J. , Horst, A. R.A. v. d. , and Godthelp, J. De voertuigsimulator van IZF-TNO: een valideringson-derzoek bij het rijden op een rechte autosnelweg, Voortgangsrapport I (The vehicle simulator of the Institute for Perception TNO---A validation study during straight-road driving, Progress Report I). Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception TNO, Report IZF 1978–16, 1978.

Brown, J. L. Visual elements in flight simulation. Report of Working Group 34. Washington, DC: Committee on Vision, Assembly of Behavioral and Social Sciences, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, 1975.

Godthelp, J. , Blaauw, G. J. , and Horst, A. R. A. V. D. Instrumented car and driving simulation: Measurements on vehicle dynamics. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception TNO, Report IZF, 1982.

Institute for Perception TNO. A large-scale simulation system for the study of navigation and driving behavior. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Author, TNO Documentation Sheet 39e, May, 1978.

McCormick, E. J. Human factors engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

10.

McLane, R. C. , and Wierwille, W. W. The influence of motion and audio cues on driver performance in an automobile simulator. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 488–501.

11.

McRuer, D. T. , Allen, R. W. , Weir, D. H. , and Klein, R. H. New results in driver steering control models. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 381–397.

12.

McRuer, D. T. , and Klein, R. H. Effects of automobile steering characteristics on driver/vehicle performance for regulation tasks. Dearborn, MI: Society of Automotive Engineers SAE Paper No. 760778, 1976. (a)

13.

McRuer, D. T. , and Klein, R. H. Comparison of human driver dynamics in an automobile on the road with those in simulators having complex and simple visual displays. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 1976. (b)

14.

McRuer, D. T. , and Krendel, E. S. Mathematical models of human pilot behavior. Paris: NATO AGARD-AG-188, 1974.

15.

Moraal, J. , and Poll, K. J. De Link-Miles rijsimulator voor pantservoertuigen; verslag van een validatieonderzoek (The Link-Miles driver simulator for tracked vehicles; a validation study). Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception TNO, Report IZF 1979–23, 1979.

16.

Mudd, S. Assessment of the fidelity of dynamic flight simulators. Human Factors, 1968, 10, 351–358.

17.

O'Hanlon, J. F. Directory of research laboratories operating driving simulators and research vehicles in North America. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, Committee Report No. A3B06, January, 1977.

18.

Repa, B. , and Wierwille, W. W. Driver performance in controlling a driving simulator with varying vehicle response characteristics. Detroit, MI: SAE Paper No. 760779, 1976.

19.

Rolfe, J. M. , Hammerton-Frase, A. M. , Poulter, R. F. , and Smith, E. M. B. Pilot response in flight and simulated flight. Ergonomics, 1970, 13, 761–768.

20.

Winer, B. J. Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.