Derivation of an Efficient Nonvocal Communication System

Abstract

In order to improve communication efficiency for speech-disabled users of nonvocal communication devices, a procedure has been developed that generates sets of units for use as language representation systems. Given a limit N to the number of units the user and device can accommodate, and the type of language system desired (phoneme sequences, letter sequences, or words with letters), the procedure produces sets of units that require a minimum number of selections per word of message.

One nonvocal individual trained in a system of this type (N = 400 phoneme sequences) improved communication rate by 30% over an alphabet system, despite a manual selection rate that was twice as slow with the large unit set.

Implications are drawn for improvement of communication rate, for the design of communication systems and devices, and for the development of systems for other languages.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Chomsky, N. spects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, A: M.LT. Press, 1965.

Foulds, R. A. , Baletsa, G. , Crochetiere, W. J. , and Meyers, C. The Tufts Non-vocal Communication Program. Proceedings of the Conference on Systems and Devices for the Disabled. Boston, MA: Tufts-New England Medical Center, 1976, 14–17.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. Developpement et premiere implantation experimentale du systeme de communication pour les infirmes moteurs cerebraux sans langage parle "PAR LE SI LA B." Quebec: Report presented to the Ministry of Social Affairs of Quebec, 1976.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. Language development of children without articulate speech. In R. N. Campbell and P. Smith (Eds.) Recent advances in the psychology oflanguage, New York: Plenum, 1978, 421–426.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. , and Oeser, T. Rate of output with a SPEEC Nonvocal Communication Board. Proceedings of the International Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, Ottawa: Canadian Medical and Biological Engineering Society, 1980, 92–93.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. , and Prather, P. Manual for teachers of SPEEC. Boston, MA: Biomedical Engineering Center, Tufts-New England Medical Center, 1979.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. , and Prather, P. Communication systems for the nonvocal based on frequent phoneme-sequences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1981, 24, 322–329.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. , Goldenberg, E. P. , and Fried-Oken, M. Nonvocal communication system with unlimited vocabulary using Apple and SPEEC syllables. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering, Chicago: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of America, 1981, 173–175.

Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. , and Rosen, M. Model for a computer-based procedure to prescribe an optimal "Keyboard." Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering. Chicago: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of America, 1981, 197–199.

10.

Howes, D. A word-count of spoken English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 572–604.

11.

Lee, L. L. Northwestern Syntax Screening Test. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1969.

12.

Merriam-Webster Dictionary, New York: Pocket Books, 1974.

13.

Nickerson, R. S. , Huggins, A. W. F. , and Stevens, K. N. Some observations on the temporal properties of speech. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Report No. 3840, 1978.

14.

Pare, L. and Deschamps-Albert, M.

An experience with Par Ie si la b at "Ecole Victor-Dore."

Communication Outlook, 1979, 2 (1), 4.

15.

Rosen, M. , and Goodenough-Trepagnier, C. Factors affecting communication rate in non-vocal communication systems. Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Conference on Rehabilitation Engineering. Chicago: Rehabilitation Engineering Society of America 1981, 194–196.

16.

Sylvestre, A. Modes de communication non verbaux: le Bliss et Ie PAR LE SI LA B. Berne, Switzerland: Proceedings of the 5th Carba-Linguaduc Conference, 1979 62–70