An analysis of accident statistics reveals that over 50% of pilot-caused civil aviation accident fatalities are the result of faulty pilot judgment. Although the FAA requires examiners to evaluate pilot judgment, it provides no definition or criteria against which such an evaluation can be made. In spite of the statistics implicating pilot judgment in many aviation fatalities, attempts to teach it are almost nonexistent. It is but a slight overstatement to say that good pilot judgment is learned by the lucky and the cautious over many years of varied flying experiences. This paper examines some of the decision-research literature in an attempt to provide an operational definition of pilot judgment and to suggest ways that pilot judgment may be taught and evaluated in civil aviation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alpert, D., and Bitzer, D. L., Advances in computer-based education. Science, 1970, 167, 1582–1590.
2.
Anderson, N. H. Comment on "analysis-of-variance model for assignment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment:"Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 63–65.
3.
Birdsall, T. G.The theory of signal detectability. In H. Quastler (Ed.) Information theory in psychology: Problems and methods, Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1955, 391–402.
4.
Federal Aviation Administration. Aviation instructor's handbook. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, No. AC 61-41, 1977.
5.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I.Belief. attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
6.
Flathers, G. W.A study of decision-making behavior of aircraft pilots deviating from a planned flight. Unpublished masters thesis, Ohio State University, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 1980.
7.
Gagne, R. M.Military training and principles of learning. American Psychologist, 1962, 17, 83–91.
8.
Gibson, J. H.Optimized flight crew training: A step toward safer operations. Fort Worth, TX: American Airlines, Flight Training Academy, 1969.
9.
Goldberg, L. R.Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments. American Psychologist, 1968, 23, 483–496.
10.
Goldstein, I. L.Training: Program development and evaluation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1974.
11.
Hoffman, P. J., Slovic, P., and Rorer, L. G.An analysis of variance model for the assessment of configural cue utilization in clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 69, 338–349.
12.
Janis, I., and Mann, L.Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press, 1977.
13.
Jensen, R. S., and Benel, R. A.Judgment evaluation and instruction in civil pilot training. Springfield, VA: National Technical Information Service, Final Report FAA-RD-78-24, 1977.
14.
Kogan, N., and Wallach, M.Risk taking: A study of cognition and personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1964.
15.
Roscoe, S. N.Aviation Psychology. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, 1980, p. 175.
16.
Shanteau, J., and Phelps, R. H.Judgment and swine: Approaches and issues in applied judgment analysis. In M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (Eds.) Human judgment and decision processes: Applications in problem settings.New York: Academic Press, 1977.
17.
Shaw, L., and Sichel, H. S.Accident proneness: Research in the occurrence, causation, and prevention of road accidents. New York: Pergamon, 1971.
18.
Shealey, J. E.Risk-taking in skilled task performance. Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society, 1974.
19.
Siovic, P.Analyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of stockbroker's decision processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 255–263.
20.
Taylor, R. N., and Dunnette, M. D.Influence of dogmatism, risk-taking propensity, and intelligence on decision-making strategies for a sample of industrial managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 420–423.
21.
Thorpe, J. A., Martin, E. L., Edwards, B. J., and Eddowes, E. E. Situational emergency training: F-15 emergency procedures training program. Williams Air Force Base, AZ: Technical Report No. AFHRL-TR-76-47(1), June, 1976.
22.
Trans World Airlines. Flight simulator evaluation. Kansas City, MO: Author, Flight Operations Training Department, 1969.
23.
Trollip, S. R., and Ortony, A.Real-time simulation in computer-assisted instruction. Instruction Science, 1977, 6, 135–149.
