Compulsory Seat Belt Usage and Driver Risk-Taking Behavior

Abstract

The danger compensation principle contends that the use of such vehicle safety features as seat belts may induce drivers to take greater risks. To test for this hypothesized effect, observational data on seat belt usage and driver risk taking were collected on 4812 drivers in Ontario, Canada, where seat belt usage is required by law. The hypothesized effect would result in higher risks taken by drivers compelled to wear seat belts, as indicated by closer following in freeway driving. Such an effect was sought by observing the difference between user and nonuser following headways and comparing it with a corresponding difference previously reported for Michigan, which has no mandatory usage law. The comparison provided no evidence of danger compensation behavior in car following. It was therefore concluded that this study presents no evidence that the safety benefits of seat belts would be diminished or neutralized by greater driver risk taking.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown, I. D.

Can ergonomics improve primary safety in road transport systems?

Ergonomics. 1979, 22, 109–116.

Conybeare, J. A. C. Evaluation of automobile safety regulations: The case of compulsory seat belt legislation in Australia. Policy Sciences, 1980, 12, 27–39.

Evans, L. , and Herman, R. Note on driver adaptation to modified vehicle starting acceleration. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 235–240.

Evans, L. , and Rothery, R. Comments on effects of vehicle type and age on driver behavior at signalized intersections. Ergonomics, 1976, 19, 559–570.

Evans, L., and Wasielewski, P. Do accident involved drivers exhibit riskier everyday driving behavior? Accident Analysis and Prevention, in press.

Hurst, P. M. Compulsory seat belt use: Further inferences. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1979, 11, 27–33.

Johannessen, H. G. , Johannessen, G. F. , and Pulley, C. H. Assessment of seat belt usage-methods/results/ recommendations. SAE Paper No. 790682, presented at SAE Passenger Car Meeting, Dearborn, MI, June, 1979.

Joksch, H. C. Critique of Sam Peltzman's study: The effect of automobile safety regulation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1976, 8, 129–137.

Motorists Information Incorporated . Michigan safety belt project report. Detroit: Author, 1978.

10.

National Safety Council . Accident Facts. Chicago: Author, 1979.

11.

O'Neill, B. A decision-theory model of danger compensation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 1977, 9, 157–165.

12.

Peltzman, S. The effects of automobile safety regulation. Journal of Political Economy, 1975, 83, 677–725.

13.

Pierce, J. Safety benefits of the seat belt legislation and speed limit reduction in Ontario. In Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the American Association for Automotive Medicine, Louisville, KY, 1979, 242-253.

14.

Robertson, L. S. The seat belt use law in Ontario: Effects on actual use. Canadian Journal of Public Heath, 1978, 69, 154–157.

15.

Rumar, K. , Berggrund, U. , Jernberg, P. , and Ytterbom, U. Driver reaction to a technical safety measurestudded tires. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 443–454.

16.

Von Buseck, C. R. , Evans, L. , Schmidt, D. E. , and Wasielewski, P. Seat belt usage and risk taking in driving behavior. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, SAE Paper 800388, included in SAE Special Publication SP-461, February, 1980.

17.

Williams, A. I. , and O'Neill, B. Seat belt laws: Implications for occupant protection. SAE Paper 790683, presented at SAE Passenger Car Meeting, Dearborn, MI, June, 1979.