Subjective workload is of increasing importance in user-machine systems, as the role of the human operator becomes less to control and more to monitor complex systems. This paper reviews the relationship between physical, cognitive, manual-control, and time-stress tasks and the subjective load experienced by an operator. The more important task variables are suggested, as are areas requiring research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnold, J. D., Johnson, R. B., and Dillow, J. D.Pitch paper pilot revisited. Cambridge, MA: M.LT., 9th NASA Annual Conference on Manual Control, 1973, 75–81.
2.
Ashkenas, L. L.Some open and closed loop aspects of airplane lateral-direction handling qualities. Paris: NATO, AGARDograph No. 533, 1966.
3.
Ashkenas, L. L.Requirements for airplane normal and failure states, Los Angeles: Systems Technology Inc., Report No. TR-1017-2, 1972.
4.
Bills, A. G.Blocking: A new principle in mental fatigue. American Journal of Psychology, 1931, 43, 230–245.
5.
Borg, G.Subjective aspects of physical work. Ergonomics, 1978, 21, 215–220.(a)
6.
Borg, G.Subjective effort in relation to physical performance and working capacity. In Pick, H. (Ed.) Psychology from research to practice, New York: Plenum, 1978, 333–361. (b)
7.
Borg, G., Bratfisch, O., and Dornic, S.Perceived difficulty of a visual search task. Stockholm: Institute of Applied Psychology, Report No. 16, 1971. (a)
8.
Borg, G., Bratfisch, O., and Dornic, S.On the problem of perceived difficulty. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1971, 12, 249–260. (b)
9.
Bratfisch, O., Borg, G., and Dornic, S.Perceived item difficulty in three tests of intellectual performance capacity. Stockholm: Institute of Applied Psychology, Report No. 29, 1972.
10.
Bratfisch, O., Dornic, S., and Borg, G.Perceived difficulty of items in a test of reasoning ability. Stockholm: Institute of Applied Psychology, Report No. 28, 1972.
11.
Chiles, W. D., and Alluisi, E. A.On the specification of operator or occupational workload with performance-measurement methods. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 515–528.
12.
Chu, Y. Y., and Rouse, W. B.Adaptive allocation of decision-making responsibility between human and computer in multi-task situations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1979, SMC-9, 769–778.
13.
Cooper, G. E.Understanding and interpreting pilot opinion. Aeronautical Engineering Review, 1957,16, 47–52.
14.
Cooper, G. E., and Harper, R. P.The use of pilot ratings in the evaluation of aircraft handling characteristics. Washington, DC: NASA, Report No. TN-D-5153, 1969.
15.
Darjanian, V., and Sheridan, T. Personal communication, 1980.
16.
Hacker, W., Plath, H. E., Richter, P., and Zimmer, K.Internal representation of task structure and mental load of work: Approaches and methods of assessment. Ergonomics, 1978, 21, 194–197.
17.
Hallsten, L., and Borg, G.Six rating scales for perceived difficulty. Stockholm: Institute of Applied Psychology, Report #58, 1975.
18.
Hess, R. A.Prediction of pilot opinion ratings using an optimal pilot model. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 459–475.
19.
Hess, R. A., and Teichgraber, W. M.Error quantization effects in compensatory tracking tasks. IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1974, SMC-4, 343–349.
20.
Hicks, T., and Wierwille, W.Comparison of five mental workload assessment procedures in a moving-base simulator. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 129–144.
21.
Jex, H.Aproposed set of standardized sub-critical tasks for tracking workload calibration. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement.New York: Plenum, 1979.
22.
Jex, H., and Clement, W. F.Defining and measuring perceptual-motor workload in manual control tasks. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement. New York: Plenum, 1979.
23.
Johannsen, G., Moray, N., Pew, R., Rasmussen, J., Sanders, A., and Wickens, C.First steps towards a designer's mental workload checklist. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement. New York: Plenum, 1979.
24.
Kleinman, D. L., Baron, S., and Levison, W. H.An optimal control model of human response: Part I: Theory and validation. Automatica, 1970, 6, 357–369.
Levison, W. H.A model for mental workload in tasks requiring continuous information processing. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement, New York: Plenum, 1979.
27.
McDonnell, J. D.Pilot rating techniques for the estimation and evaluation of handling qualities. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Report No. AFFDL-TR-76, 1968.
28.
McDonnell, J. D.An application of measurement methods to improve the quantitative nature of pilot ratings scales. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine systems, 1969, MMS-10, 81–92.
29.
McRuer, D., and Krendel, E.Mathematical models of pilot behavior. Paris: NATO, AGARDograph No. 188, 1974.
30.
McRuer, D., and Weir, D. H.Theory of manual vehicular control. Ergonomics, 1969, 12, 599–633.
31.
Moray, N. (Ed.). Mental Workload: Theory and measurement. New York: Plenum, 1979. (a)
32.
Moray, N.Models and measurement of mental workload. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement, New York: Plenum, 1979. (b)
33.
Ogden, G. D., Levine, J. M., and Eisner, E. J.Measurement of workload by secondary tasks. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 529–548.
34.
Oswald, I.Sleeping and waking. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1962.
35.
Parks, D.Current workload methods and emerging challenges. In N. Moray (Ed.) Mental workload: Theory and measurement. New York: Plenum, 1979.
36.
Phillip, V., Reiche, D., and Kirchner, J.The use of subjective rating. Ergonomics, 1971, 14, 611–616,
37.
Roscoe, S., Ellis, G. A., and Chiles, W. D.Assessing pilot workload. Brussels: NATO, AGARDograph No. 233, 1978.
38.
Rule, R. G., and Fenton, R. E. On the effects of state information on driver vehicle performance in car following. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1972, SMC-2, 630–637.
39.
Schmidt, D. K.A queueing analysis of the air traffic controllers' workload. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1978, SMC-8, 492–498.
40.
Senders, J. W. Personal communication. 1979.
41.
Stave, A.The eFfects of cockpit environment on long-term pilot performance. Human Factors, 1977, 19,503–514.
42.
Tulga, M. K.Dynamic decision making in multi task supervisory control: Comparison of an optimal algorithm to human behavior. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Man-Machine Systems Laboratory, 1978.
43.
Verplank, W. L.Is there an optimal workload in manual control? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, M.I.T., Cambridge, MA, 1977.
44.
Wewerinke, P. H.Human operator workload for various control conditions. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH, 10th NASA Annual Conference on Manual Control, 1974, 167-192.
45.
Wickens, C., and Tsang, P.Attention allocation in dynamic environments, Champaign, IL: Engineering Psychology Research Labs, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Technical report EPL-79-3/AFOSR-79-3, 1979.
46.
Wierwille, W. W., and Williges, R. C.Survey and analysis of operator workload assessment techniques. Blacksburg, VA: Systematics, Inc., Report No. S-78-101, 1978.
47.
Wierwille, W. W.Physiological measures of aircrew mental workload. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 575–594.
48.
Williges, R. C., and Wierwille, W. W.Behavioral measures of aircrew mental workload. Human Factors, 1979, 21, 549–574.
49.
Yoerger, D.Man-machine performance for a simulated aircraft with multi-level automatic control system. Cambridge, MA: Man-Machine-Systems Laboratory, 1979.
50.
Yoshitake, H.Relation between the symptoms and the feelings of fatigue. Ergonomics, 1971, 14, 175–186.
