A model of the regulation of muscle strength exertion is proposed. Based on the model, methods are discussed to assess whether a subject exerts maximal or submaximal efforts. Results with 40 subjects indicate that a simple technique may be developed to judge if a subject is following instructions to exert a maximal contraction in a routine test of voluntary muscle strength.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Astrand, P. O. and Rodahl, K.Textbook of work physiology (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hili, 1977.
2.
Caldwell, L. S., Chaffin, D. B., Dukes-Dobos, F. N., Kroemer, K. H. E., Laubach, L. L., Snook, S. H., and Wasserman, D. E.A proposed standard procedure for static muscle strength testing. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1974, 35, 201–206.
3.
Caldwell, L. S. and Kroemer, K. H. E.Procedural effects in the measurement of static muscle strength. Fort Knox, KY: U.S. Army Medical Research Laboratory, Report No. 1305, 1977.
4.
Chaffin, D. B.Ergonomics guide for the assessment of human static strength. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1975, 37(7), 505–511.
5.
Houk, J. C.Regulation of stiffness by skelemotor reflexes. Annual Review of Physiology, 1979, 41, 99–114.
6.
Hyvaerinen, J., Komi, P. R., and Puhakka, P.Endurance of muscle contraction under hypnosis. Acta Physio. Scand., 1977, 100, 485–487.
7.
Kroemer, K. H. E.Human strength: Terminology, measurement and interpretation of data. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 297–313.
8.
Kroemer, K. H. E.Designing for muscular strength of various populations. Wright-Patterson AFB, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, AMRL-TR-72–46, 1974. (a)
9.
Kroemer, K. H. E.Ergonomie im Zusammenhang mit der Sicherheit am Arbeitsplatz (Ergonomics in relation to work safety). Sichere Arbeit, 1974, 27(4), 5–12. (b)
10.
Kroemer, K. H. E.Muscle strength as a criterion in control design for diverse populations. In A. Chapanis (Ed.) Ethnic variables in human factors engineering. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1975, 67–89.
11.
Kroemer, K. H. E.Die Messung der Muskelstaerke des Menschen (The assessment of human muscle strength). Dortmund, West Germany: Bundesanstalt fuer Arbeitsschutz und Unfallforschung, Forschungsbericht 161, 1977.
12.
Kroemer, K. H. E.The assessment of human strength. In C. G. Drury (Ed.) Safety in manual materials handling.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, DHEW (NIOSH) Publication No. 78–185, 1978.
13.
Kroemer, K. H. E.A new model of muscle strength regulation. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, Boston, 1979, 19–20.
14.
Kroemer, K. H. E. and Howard, J. M.Towards standardization of muscle strength testing. Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, 1970, 2(4), 224–230.
15.
Kroemer, K. H. E. and Marras, W. S.Towards an objective assessment of the maximal voluntary contraction component in routine muscle strength measurements. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 1980, 45, 1–9. (a)
16.
Kroemer, K. H. E. and Marras, W. S.A technique for establishing true levels of muscle strength exertion. Detroit: Wayne State University, IE/OR Department, Final Report, Contract F49620-79-C-0109, 1980. (b)
17.
Marras, W. S.Tests to distinguish between "true" and "faked" maximum muscle strength exertions. Unpublished masters thesis, Wayne State University, Detroit, June, 1978.
18.
Maton, B.Motor unit differentiation and integrated surface EMG in voluntary isometric contraction. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 1976, 38, 149–157.
19.
Tesch, P. and Karlsson, J.Isometric strength performance and muscle fiber type distribution in man. Acta Physiol. Scand., 1978, 103, 47–51.
20.
Thorstensson, A., Grimby, G., and Karlsson, J.Forcevelocity relations and fiber composition in human knee extensor muscles. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1976, 40(1), 12–15.
21.
Viitasalo, J. T. and Komi, P. R.Force-time characteristics and fiber composition in human leg extensor muscles. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 1978, 40(1), 7–15.
