Computer Commands in Restricted Natural Language: Some Aspects of Memory and Experience

Abstract

In this experiment, two groups of subjects having different levels of experience with computers were tested to compare the learning and recall of computer command definitions that differed in context and redundancy and to study the effect of context change. The results show that inexperienced (naive) subjects have different requirements than do more experienced subjects. The experienced group recalls more meanings than the inexperienced group but is more negatively influenced by the number of competing words (that is, different words used to label the same computer function) than by contextual connotation. For the inexperienced subjects, particularly, it appears that computer-oriented words used as commands are better than more usual words. Besides, inexperienced subjects are more negatively influenced by context changes than are experienced subjects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson, J. R. Language, memory and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.

Bisseret, A. Analysis of mental processes involved in air traffic control. Ergonomics, 1971, 14.565–570.

Carpenter, P. and Just, M. A. Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification. Psychological Review. 1975, 82, 45–73.

Chase, W. G. and Simon, H. A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 1973, 4, 55–81.

Clark, H. H. Semantics and comprehension. In T. A. (Ed.) Current trends in linguistics (Vol. 1). The Hague: Mouton. 1973.

Collins, A. M. and Quillian, M. R.

Does category size affect categorization time?

Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9. 432–438.

Haygood, R. C. and Bourne, L. E. Attribute and rule learning aspects of conceptual behavior. Psychological Review, 1965. 72, 175–195.

Hoc, J. M. The role of mental representation in learning a programming language. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1977, 9, 87–105.

Holland, V. M. and Rose, A. M. Understanding instructions with complex conditions. Washington, DC: American Institute for Research, Report No.5, February, 1980.

10.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. The interpretation of quantified sentences. In G. B. Flores d'Arcais and W. J. M. Levelt (Eds.) Advances in psycholinguistics. Amsterdam: Amsterdam, North-Holland, 1970.

11.

Johnson-Laird, P. N. Reasoning: Representation and processes in children an adults. In R. Falmagne (Ed.) Models of deduction. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.

12.

Kintsch, W. The representation of meaning in memory. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, 1974.

13.

McKeithen, K. B., Reitman, J. S., Rueter, H. R., and Hirtle, S. C. Knowledge organisation and skill differences in computer programmers. Manuscript submitted for publication.

14.

Michard, A. Representations operatoires et modele du processus dans les taches de diagnostic. These de Doctorat de 3ème cycle. Université Paris VIII, 1978.

15.

Ochanine, D. A. The operative image of a controlled object in “man-automatic machine” systems. XIII International Congress of Psychology. Moscow, 1966.

16.

Ochanine, D. A. Le role des images operatives dans la regulation des activites de travail. Personal communication, Toulouse. March 11-12, 1976.

17.

Rips, L. J. , Smith, E. E. , and Shoben, E. J. Semantic composition in sentence verification. Journal or Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978, 7, 904–912.

18.

Scapin, D. L. Ergonomie des dialogues Homme-ordinateur: Revue de question. Manuscript submitted for publication, 1980.

19.

Sebillotte, S. Traitement et selection de I'information contenue dans un dossier obstetrical. Le Chesnay, France: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Technical Report DM R02, 1978.

20.

Senach, B. Resolution de problemes d'aiguillage par des operateurs d'un reseau ferre. Paper presented at the XVth Congress of the Societe d'Ergonomie de Langue Francaise, Paris, December, 1979.

21.

Shneiderman, B. Exploratory experiments in programmers' behavior. International Journal or Computer and In formation Sciences, 1976. 5, 123–143.

22.

Sime, M. E. , Green, T. R. , and Guest, D. J. Psychological evaluation of two conditional constructions used in computer languages. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1973, 5, 105–113.

23.

Volleau, N. and Sperandio, J. C. Etude des modes de consultation de dossiers par les agents des impots. Le Chesnay, France: Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en Automatique, Technical Report CI 7907 R04, 1979.