Effect of Training Device on Retention and Transfer of a Procedural Task

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of three different training devices with respect to initial training, retention, and transfer of training. The training devices evaluated during the study were designed to require varying degrees of visual imagery utilization through reductions in the stimuli that provide visual cueing and feedback. The particular task used was representative of the many sequential procedures performed which range from operating master control panels in industrial plants to conducting normal and emergency procedures in air vehicles. The results of the study indicate that: (1) training devices do not need to be of high fidelity to be effective in training procedural tasks and (2) the use of a training strategy that requires the trainees to provide their own cueing and feedback from memory is effective in increasing the retention of procedure-following skills. These results have important implications for both the dollar cost and logistics of initial and refresher training, as well as for the retention efficiency of an important aspect of the human's present job description.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bernstein, B. R. and Gonzalez, B. K. Learning, retention, and transfer in military training. Orlando, FL: Naval Training Device Center, Technical Report NAVTRADEVCEN 69-C-0253-1, September, 1971.

Cox, J. A. , Wood, R. O., Jr. , Boren, L. M. , and Thorne, H. W. Functional and appearance fidelity of training devices for fixed-procedure tasks. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Office, Technical Report 65-4, June, 1965.

Gardin, G. R. and Sitterley, T. E. Degradation of learned skills: A review and annotated bibliography. Seattle: The Boeing Company, Report D180-15080-1. Prepared under NASA Contract No. NAS9-10962, June, 1972.

Grimsley, D. L. Acquisition, retention, and retraining: Effects of high and low fidelity in training devices. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Office, Technical Report 69-1, February, 1969. (a)

Grimsley, D. L. Acquisition, retention, and retraining: Group studies on using low fidelity training devices. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Office, Technical Report 69-4, March, 1969. (b)

Hufford, L. E. and Adams, J. A. The contribution of parttask training to the relearning of a flight maneuver. Port Washington, NY: Naval Training Device Center, Technical Report NAVTRADEVCEN 297-2, March, 1961.

Mengelkoch, R. F. , Adams, J.A. , and Gainer, C. A. The forgetting of instrument flying skills as a function of the level of initial proficiency. Port Washington, NY: Naval Training Device Center, Technical Report NAVTRADEVCEN 71-16-18, 1960.

Mengelkoch, R. F. , Adams, J. A'. , and Gainer, C. A. The forgetting of instrument flying skills. Human factors, 1971, 13, 397–405.

Micheli, G. S. Analysis of the transfer of training, substitution and fidelity of simulation of training equipment. Orlando, FL: Training Analysis and Evaluation Group, Report 2, 1972.

10.

Mirabella, A. , and Wheaton, G. R. Effects of task index variation on transfer of training criteria. Orlando, FL: Naval Training Equipment Center, Technical Report NAVTRAEQUIPCEN 72-C-0126-1, January, 1974.

11.

Naylor, J. G. and Briggs, G. E. Long-term retention of learned skills: A review of the literature. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aeronautical System Division, Behavioral Sciences Laboratory, ASD Technical Report 61-30, 1961.

12.

Prophet, W. W. and Boyd, H. A. Device-task fidelity and transfer of training aircraft cockpit procedure training. Alexandria, VA: Human Resources Research Office, Technical Report 70-10, July, 1970.

13.

Sitterley, T. E. Degradation of learned skills: Static practice effectiveness for visual approach and landing. Seattle: The Boeing Company, Technical Report D180-1786-1, May, 1974.

14.

Sitterley, T. E. and Berge, W. A. Degradation of learned skills: Effectiveness of practice methods on simulated space flight skill retention. Seattle: The Boeing Company, Report D180-15081-1, Prepared under NASA Contract No. NAS9-10962, 1972.

15.

Winer, B. J. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design. New York: McGraw Hill, 1971.