The Aircraft Landing Test: An Information Processing Approach to Pilot Selection

Abstract

The Aircraft Landing (AL) test is a pilot selection device in which attempts are made at simulated approaches and landings of an aircraft on a runway until a criterion skill level is achieved. The test was designed with principles from the information processing model of skilled performance in mind, and two concepts from the model were tested: hierarchical mechanisms and feedback. Using Canadian Forces pilot trainees, validities up to 0.45 (n=104, no previous flying experience) and 0.49 (n=26, previous flying experience) were obtained against a criterion score based on flying tests at 7 and 12 h in a light aircraft. It was concluded that the practical utility of the test was highly satisfactory and that its validity could be increased by modifications. The pattern of results provided some support for the theoretical predictions from the information processing model, but methodological difficulties prevented a clear-cut interpretation. Advantages of this approach over an abilities model are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvares, K. M. and Hulin, C. L. Two explanations of temporal changes in ability-sklll relationships: A literature review and theoretical analysis. Human Factors, 1972, 14, 295–308.

Annett, S. Feedback and human behaviour. Harmondsworth, U.K.: Penguin, 1969.

Bilodeau, I. McD . Information feedback. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.) Principles of skill acquisition. New York: Academic Press, 1969.

Broadbent, D. E. Perception and Communication. London: Scientific Book Guild, 1958.

Broadbent, D. E. Levels, hierarchies and the locus of control. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977, 29, 181–201.

Damos, D. L. Residual attention as a predictor of pilot performance. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 435–440.

De Maio, J. , Parkinson, S. , Leshowitz, B. , Crosby, J. , and Thorpe, J. A. Visual scanning: Comparisons between student and instructor pilots. Williams Air Force Base, AZ: USAF Human Resources Laboratory, AFHRL-TR-76-10, 1976.

Fitts, P. M. , Perceptual-motor skill learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.) Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press, 1964.

Fitts, P.M. and Posner, M.I. Human performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole, 1967.

10.

Fleishman, E.A. Testing for psychomotor abilities by means of apparatus tests. Psychological Bulletin. 1953, 50, 242–622.

11.

Fleishman, E. A. Psychomotor selection tests: Research and application in the U.S. Air Force. Personnel Psychology, 1956, 9, 449–467.

12.

Fleishman, E.A. On the relation between abilities, learning and human performance. American Psychologist, 1972, 27, 1017–1032.

13.

Gopher, D. and Kahneman, D. Individual differences in attention and the prediction of flight criteria. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 1335–1342.

14.

Guilford, J. P. Fundamental statistics in psychology and education (4th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

15.

Henderson, S. E. Role of feedback in the development and maintenance of a complex skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1977, 3, 224–233.

16.

Ingram, D. L. Notes on a flight grading system for aircrew pilot candidates. Toronto: Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit, Technical Note 66–5, 1966.

17.

Lockwood, G. H. Validation study of the English version: RCAF aircrew aptitude tests. Toronto: Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit, Research Report 65–3, 1965.

18.

McInnis, C. E. Validation study of the French version: RCAF aircrew aptitude tests. Toronto: Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit, Research Report 65–4, 1965.

19.

Mowbray, G.H. and Rhoades, M. V. On the reduction of choice reaction times with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1959, 11, 16–23.

20.

Musten, R. G. , Fowler, B. , and Archibald, B. Pilot selection in the Canadian Forces. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Meeting, Montreal, Quebec, August, 1973.

21.

North, R. A. and Gopher, D. Measures of attention as predictors of flight performance. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 1–14.

22.

Pew, R.W. Acquisition of hierarchical control over the temporal organization of a skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1966, 71, 764–771.

23.

Posner, M.I. and Boies, S.J. Components of attention. Psychological Review, 1971, 78, 391–408.

24.

Povenmire H.K. , Alvares, K.M. , and Damos, D. L. , Observer-observer flight check reliability. Savoy, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Institute of Aviation, Aviation Research Laboratory, TRLF-70-2, 1970.

25.

Schneider, W. and Shiffrin, R. M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 1977, 84, 1–66.

26.

Shiffrin, R.M. and Schneider, W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review, 1911, 84, 127–190.

27.

Welford, A.T. Skilled performance: Perceptual and motor skills. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1976