A methodology is described for providing a quantitative description of the effects of aging on human perceptual-motor capability. Specifically, application of the experimental and analytical techniques of manual control is suggested so that these effects can be quantified in terms of the parameters of a model for human perception and control.
Important and immediate contributions to the study of aging can be expected from application of the methodology outlined in this paper. First, measures of perceptual-motor performance that are expected to be more sensitive to the effects of age than those usually available will be obtained. Second, these measures will be interpretable in terms of a model for human information processing that has been validated extensively for subjects in the 20-to 40-year age bracket. Using this model, one would be able to predict the effects of aging on a variety of tasks. Finally, a basis would be developed for a functional (rather than chronological) description of aging.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Baron, S. and Kleinman, D. L.The human as an optimal controller and information processor. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 1969, MMS-10, 9–17.
2.
Baron, S. and Kleinman, D. L.Manned vehicle systems analysis by means of modern control theory. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Report No. 1967, June, 1970.
3.
Birren, J. E.The relation of writing speed to age in the senile psychoses. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1951, 15, 243–249.
4.
Birren, J. E.Principles of research on aging. In J. E. Birren (Ed.) Handbook of aging and the individual: Psychology and biological aspects.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959.
5.
Birren, J. E.Toward an experimental psychology of aging. American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 124–135.
6.
Craik, F.Applications of signal detection theory to studies of aging. Interdisciplinary Topics of Gerontology, 1969, 4, 147–157.
7.
Fozard, J. L. and Nuttall, R. L.General aptitude test battery for men differing in age and socio-economic status. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1971, 55, 372–379.
8.
Gregory, R. L.Increase in neurological noise as a factor in aging. Proceedings of the 4th Congress of the International Association on Gerontology, 1957, 314–324.
9.
Griew, S.Complexity of response and time of initiating responses in relation to age. American Journal of Psychology, 1959, 72, 83–88.
10.
Kirchner, W.Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information, Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1958, 55, 352–358.
11.
Kleinman, D. L., Baron, S., and Levison, W.An optimal control model of human response. Part I. Automatica, May, 1970.
12.
Levison, W. H. The effects 01 display gain and signal bandwidth on human controller remnant. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Report No. AMRL-TR-70-93, March, 1971.
13.
Levison, W. H., Elkind, J. I., and Ward, J. L. Studies of multi-variable manual control systems: A model for task interference. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA CR-1746, 1971.
14.
McRuer, D., Graham, D., Krendel, E, and Reisener, W. Human pilot dynamics in compensatory systems---Theory, models, and experiments with controlled element and forcing function variations. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH: Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Report No. AFFDL-TR-65-15, July, 1965.
15.
McRuer, D. and Weir, D. H.Theory of manual vehicular control. IEEE Transactions on Man-Machine Systems, 1969, MMS-10, 257–291.
16.
Rabbitt, P. and Rogers, M.Age and choice between responses in a self-paced repetitive task. Ergonomics, 1965, 8, 435–444.
17.
Repa, B. S., Albers, J. W., Potvin, A. R., and Tourtellotte, W. W.The use of a battery of tracking tests in the quantitative evaluation of neurological function. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference on Manual Control, Los Angeles, NASA SP-281, 1971, 119–123.
18.
Repa, B. S., Albers, J. W., Pew, R. W., and Tourtellotte, W. W.Clinical applications of tracking. Proceedings of the Eighth Annual Conference on Manual Control, Ann Arbor, MI, AFFDL-TR-72-92, 1972, 343–367.
19.
Simon, J. R.Signal processing time as a function of aging. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1968, 78, 76–80.
20.
Singleton, W.The change of movement timing with age. British Journal of Psychology, 1954, 45, 166–172.
21.
Szafran, J.Age differences in sequential decisions and cardiovascular status among pilots. Aerospace. Medicine, 1965, 36, 303–310.
22.
Talland, G. A.Visual signal detection as a function of age, input rate, and signal frequency. Journal of Psychology, 1966, 63, 106–114.
23.
Welford, A. T.Aging and human skill.London: Oxford University Press, 1958.
24.
Welford, A. T.Changes in the speed of performance with age and their industrial significance. Ergonomics, 1962, 5, 139–182.
25.
Welford, A. T. and Birren, J. E. (Eds.) Behavior, aging, and the nervous system.Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1965.
26.
Welford, A. T.Age and skill: Motor, intellectual and social. In A. T. Welford and J. E. Birren (Eds.) Decision making and age.New York: Karger, 1969.
27.
Zacharias, G. S. and Levison, W. H.A performance analyzer for identifying changes in human operator tracking strategies. Cambridge, MA: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., Report No. 3901, August, 1978.
