The anthropometric elderly, arbitrarily defined as those 65 years of age and above, are a distinct subgroup with special human factors needs. They are significantly smaller in stature and in many other body dimensions than the general population. This smaller size results both from the secular trend (people are currently growing taller and larger than in the past) and from various biological changes inherent in the aging process. Weight and certain other dimensions are less age-affected, however, except at more advanced ages. Existing information on the anthropometry of the elderly is reviewed, and tabular data are presented on selected “human engineering” dimensions. Additional, more comprehensive, functional anthropometric data are needed for this population.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, S., Johnson, C. L., and Najjar, M. F.Height and weight of adults 18-74 years of age in the United States. Advance data, No.3. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, 1976.
2.
Bakwin, H. and McLaughlin, S. M.Secular increase in height. Is the end in sight?The Lancet, December 5, 1964, 1195–1196.
3.
Brown, O. T. and Wigzell, F. W.The significance of span as a clinical measurement. In W. F. Anderson and B. Isaacs (Eds.) Current achievements in geriatrics.London: Cassell, 1964, 246-251.
4.
Chapanis, A.Human engineering environments for the aged. Applied Ergonomics, 1974, 5, 72–80.
5.
Damon, A. and Stoudt, H. W.The functional anthropology of old men. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 485–491.
6.
Damon, A., Seltzer, C. C., Stoudt, H. W., and Bell, B.Age and physique in healthy white veterans at Boston. Journal of Gerontology, 1972, 27, 202–208.
7.
Dequeker, J. V., Baeyens, J.-P., and Claessens, J.The significance of stature as a clinical measurement of aging. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1969, 17, 169–179.
8.
Edholm, O. G.The biology of work.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
9.
Friedlander, J. S., Costa, P. T., Bosse, R., Ellis, E., Rhoads, J. G., and Stoudt, H. W.Longitudinal physique changes among healthy white veterans at Boston. Human Biology, 1977, 49, 541–558.
10.
Hamill, P. V. V., Drizd, T. A., Johnson, C. L., Reed, R. B., and Roche, A. F.NCHS growth charts, 1976. Monthly Vital Statistics Report.1976, 25(3), 1–22.
11.
Himes, J. H. and Mueller, W. H.Age-associated statural loss and socioeconomic status. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1977, 25, 171–174.
12.
Kleemeier, R. K.Behavior and the organization of the bodily and the external environment. In J. E. Birren (Ed.) Handbook of aging and the individual.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1959, 400–451.
13.
Pett, L. B. and Ogilvie, G. F.The report on Canadian average weights, heights and skinfolds. Canadian Bulletin on Nutrition1957, 5, 1–81.
14.
Roberts, D. F.Functional anthropology of elderly women. Ergonomics, 1960, 3, 321–327.
15.
Rossman, I. (Ed.) Clinical geriatrics (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1979.
16.
Rossman, I.Anatomic and body composition changes with aging. In C. E. Finch and L. Hayflick (Eds.) Handbook of the biology of aging.New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1977, 189–221.
17.
Stoudt, H. W., Damon, A., and McFarland, R. A.Heights and weights of white Americans. Human Biology, 1960, 32, 331–341.
18.
Stoudt, H. W., Damon, A., McFarland, R. A., and Roberts, J.Weight, height, and selected body dimensions of adults. Vital and health statistics, Series 11, Number 8. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, 1965.
19.
Stoudt, H. W., Damon, A., McFarland, R. A., and Roberts, J.Skinfolds, body girths, biacromial diameter and selected anthropometric indices of adults. Vital and health statistics, Series 11, Number 35. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service, 1973.
20.
Tanner, J. M.Growth at adolescence.Oxford: Blackwell, 1962.
21.
Trotter, M. and Gieser, G.The effect of aging on stature. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1951, 9, 311–324.
22.
Ward, J. S. and Kirk, N. S.Anthropometry of elderly women. Ergonomics, 1967, 10, 17–24.
