Predicting Search Performance for Multiple Targets

Abstract

Performance in a visual search task is usually measured by the cumulative probability of locating a target, F(t), in a given time (t). Two extreme F(t) against (t) relationships have been postulated, one assuming that search is random, and the other assuming that search is systematic. However, these relationships have only been available for the situation in which each search field contains a single occurrence of a single type of target. This paper extends both search models (random and systematic) first to the case of multiple occurrences of a single fault type within a search field and second to the case of multiple fault types. For systematic search, these two cases can be combined to predict the effects of multiple occurrences of multiple fault types. The general F(t) relationships are given in each case and illustrated with a worked example.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloomfield, J. R. Visual search. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, England, 1970.

Bloomfield, J. R. Experiments on visual search. Visual Search. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences, 1973. 1–25.

Drury, C. G. Inspection of sheet materials-Model and data. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 257–265.

Drury, C. G. and Barnes, R. E. Searching for multiple occurrences of a target. Buffalo: State University of New York, Department of Industrial Engineering, June, 1979.

Drury, C. G. and Clement, M. R. The effects of area, density and number of background characters in visual search. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 597–602.

Greening, C. P. Mathematical modeling of air-to-ground target acquisition. Human Factors, 1976, 18, 111–148.

Hillier, F. S. and Lieberman, G. J. Operations research. San Francisco: Holden-Day, Inc., 1974.

Human Factors Society . Inc. Human Factors, 1979. 21(3).

Krendel, E. S. and Wodinski, J. Visual search in unstructured fields. In A. Morris and E. P. Horne (Eds.) Viwal search techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1960.

10.

Lamar, E. S. Operational background and physical considerations relative to visual search problems. In A. Morris and E. P. Horne (Eds.) Visual search techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1960.

11.

Megaw, E. D. and Richardson, J. Eye movements and industrial inspection. Applied Ergonomics, 1979. 10, 145–154.

12.

Morawski, T. B. Economic models of industrial inspection. Unpublished masters thesis, State University of New York, Buffalo, 1978.

13.

Morris, A. and Horne, E. P. (Eds.) Visual search techniques. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, 1960.

14.

National Academy of Sciences Visual search. Washington, DC: Author, 1973.

15.

Parkes, K. R. Visual and televisual detection studies. Part 1. The effect of navigational uncertainty and target difficulty on detection performance. Loughborough, England: University of Loughborough, Technical Report, 1972.

16.

Spitz, G. and Drury, C. G. A test of a two-stage model of visual inspection. Human Factors, 1978. 20, 521–528.

17.

Tsao, Y-C. , Drury, C. G. , and Morawski, T. B. Human performance in sampling inspection. Human Factors, 1979. 21, 99–105.

18.

Williams, L. G. Target conspicuity and visual search. Human Factors, 1966. 8, 80–92.