Visual Search with Embedded Targets: Color and Texture Differences

Abstract

Two embedded target visual search displays were used in three kinds of experiment. One display had a color and the other a monochrome texture background. In each trial of each experiment a single target was presented. First, 28 observers rated the discriminability of five color and four monochrome targets from the color and monochrome backgrounds, respectively. Second, five observers searched the color and six the monochrome display for the appropriate targets and, after practice, there were 60 trials per observer per target. Third, using the five observers who searched the color display and four of the six who searched the monochrome, the extent into the periphery that they could see the appropriate targets when the displays were exposed for 0.3 seconds was measured. Analysis of the data showed that, for the color displays, simple equations, developed for competition search situations, could be used to relate together the three types of measure. The equations were less successful for the monochrome display.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bloomfield

J. R.

Visual search. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, 1970

Bloomfield

J. R.

Visual search in complex fields: size differences between target disc and surrounding discs.

Human Factors, 1972, 14, 139–148

Bloomfield

J. R.

Beckwith

W. E.

Emerick

Marmurek

H. H.

Tei

B. E.

Traub

B. H.

Visual search with embedded targets. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University/Army Research Institute report on Grant No. DAHC19–73-G-0009, March, 1974

Bloomfield

J. R.

Howarth

C. I.

Testing visual search theory. In H. W. Leibowitz (Ed.) Image evaluation, Proceedings of NATO Advisory Group on Human Factors Symposium, Munich, Germany, 1969, 203–214

Bloomfield

J. R.

Howarth

C. I.

Bone

K. E.

Visual search and pattern recognition. Nottingham, England: University of Nottingham Report on M.O.D. (P.E.), Contract No. AT/24 018/9C, October, 1972

Brodatz

Textures. New York: Dover, 1966

Cott

H. B.

Adaptive coloration in animals. London: Methuen, 1940

Drury

C. G.

Inspection of sheet materials—model and data.

Human Factors, 1975, 17, 257–265

Gottsdanker

The relation between the nature of the search situation and the effectiveness of alternative strategies of search. In Morris

Horne

E. P.

(Eds.) Visual search techniques. Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 1960, 181–186

10.

Howarth

C. I.

Bloomfield

J. R.

A rational equation for predicting search times in simple inspection tasks.

Psychonomic Science, 1969, 17, 225–226

11.

Parkes

K. R.

Visual and televisual detection studies. Part 1: The effect of navigational uncertainty and target difficulty on detection performance. Loughborough, England: University of Loughborough Technical Report, 1967. (a)

12.

Parkes

K. R.

Visual and televisual detection studies. Part 2: The effect of viewing distance on target detection performance. Loughborough, England: University of Loughborough Technical Report, 1967. (b)

13.

Parkes

K. R.

Visual and televisual detection studies. Part 4: A study of target detection performance in relation to the signal/noise ratio of the television display system. Loughborough, England: University of Loughborough Technical Report, 1968

14.

Parkes

K. R.

Visual and televisual detection studies. Part 5: The effect of limited search time on target detection performance. Loughborough, England: University of Loughborough Technical Report, 1969

15.

Rhodes

Predicting the difficulty of locating targets from judgments of image characteristics. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories, AMRL-TDR-64-19, March, 1964

16.

Smith

S. W.

Visual search time and peripheral discriminability.

Journal of the Optical Society of America, 1961, 51, 1462(A)

17.

Williams

L. G.

Target conspicuity and visual search.

Human Factors, 1966, 8, 80–92