Comparison of Five Mental Workload Assessment Procedures in a Moving-Base Driving Simulator

Abstract

Five methods of measuring mental workload (secondary task performance, visual occlusion, cardiac arrhythmia, subjective opinion rating scales, and primary task performance) were compared for sensitivity to changes in operator loading. Each was used to differentiate among low, medium, and high levels of workload defined in terms of the application point of crosswind gusts in a driving task.

The driving task was produced using an automobile driving simulator with a six-degree of freedom computer generated display, a four-degree of freedom physical motion system, and a four-channel sound system. Techniques of mental workload measurement that have shown promise in previous studies were used as a between-subjects factor, and subjects were presented with a within-subject factor of wind gust placement. Gusts at the front of the vehicle represented high workload levels, and gusts toward the center of the vehicle represented progressively lower levels of workload.

The results showed significant differences among workload levels for subjective opinion scales and primary performance measures of lateral deviation, yaw deviation, and steering reversals. A relative sensitivity estimate of these would be, from highest to lowest sensitivity, steering reversals and yaw deviation, rating scales, and lateral deviation. The techniques of occlusion, cardiac arrhythmia, and secondary task performance yielded no significant workload effect.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brecht

Cardiac arrhythmia and secondary tasks as measures of mental load. Unpublished master's thesis, California State University at Northridge, 1977.

Brown

I. D.

A comparison of two subsidiary tasks used to measure fatigue in car drivers. Ergonomics, 1965, 8, 467–473.

Brown

I. D.

Subjective and objective comparisons of successful and unsuccessful trainee drivers. Ergonomics, 1966, 9, 49–56.

Brown

I. D.

Poulton

E. C.

Measuring the spare mental capacity of car drivers by a subsidiary task. Ergonomics, 1961, 4, 35–40.

Cooper

G. E.

Harper

R. P.

Jr.

The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities. Moffett Field, California: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, NASA TN-D-5153, April, 1969.

Edwards

A. L.

Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

Farber

Gallagher

Attentional demand as a measure of the influence of visibility conditions on driving task difficulty. Highway Research Record, 1972, 414, 1–5.

Gartner

W. B.

Murphy

M. R.

Pilot workload and fatigue: a critical survey of concepts and assessment techniques. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, NASA TN-D-8365, November, 1976.

Hicks

J. A.

Soliday

S. M.

An evaluation of sinus arrhythmia as a measure of mental load. In Knowles

W. B.

Sanders

Muckler

, (Eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 1972, 191–196.

10.

Hoffman

E. R.

Joubert

P. N.

The effect of changes in some vehicle handling variables on driver steering performance. Human Factors, 1966, 8, 245–263.

11.

Kalsbeek

J. W. H.

Sinus arrhythmia and the dual-task method in measuring mental load. In Singleton

W. T.

Fox

J. G.

Whitfield

, (Eds.) Measurement of man at work. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1971, 101–114.

12.

Kalsbeek

J. W. H.

Sykes

R. N.

Objective measurement of mental load. In Sanders

A. F.

(ed.) Attention and performance. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing, 1967, 253–261.

13.

Knowles

W. B.

Operator loading tasks. Human Factors, 1963, 5, 155–161.

14.

McDonald

L. B.

Ellis

N. C.

Driver work load for various turn radii and speeds. Transportation Research Record, 1975, 530, 18–30.

15.

McLane

R. C.

Wierwille

W. W.

The influence of motion and audio cues on driver performance in an automobile simulator. Human Factors, 1975, 17, 488–501.

16.

Michon

J. A.

A note on the measurement of perceptual motor load. Ergonomics, 1964, 7, 461–463.

17.

Michon

J. A.

Tapping regularity as a measure of perceptual motor load. Ergonomics, 1966, 9, 401–412.

18.

Rolfe

J. M.

The secondary task as a measure of mental load. In Singleton

W. T.

Fox

J. G.

Whitfield

, (Eds.) Measurement of man at work. New York: Van Nostrand-Reinhold, 1971, 135–148.

19.

Senders

J. W.

Kristofferson

A. B.

Levison

W. H.

Dietrich

C. W.

Ward

J. L.

The attentional demand of automobile driving. Highway Research Record, 1967, 195, 15–33.

20.

Wierwille

W. W.

Driving simulator design for realistic handling. In Sachs

H. K.

(ed.) Proceedings Third International Conference on Vehicle System Dynamics, Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger, 1975, 186–199.

21.

Wierwille

W. W.

Gutmann

J. C.

Comparison of primary and secondary task measures as a function of simulated vehicle dynamics and driving conditions. Human Factors, 1978, 20, 233–244.

22.

Wierwille

W. W.

Williges

R. C.

Survey and analysis of operator workload assessment techniques. Blacksburg, Virginia: Systemetrics, Inc., Report S-78–101, September, 1978. (AD-A059501).