The legibility of five 5 × 7 dot-matrix alphanumeric fonts was evaluated under varying degrees of character degradation. After “importance values” had been experimentally determined for every spot of a 7 × 9 matrix, in the center of which lay a 5 × 7 stimulus alphanumeric, each character was exposed tachistoscopically while manipulating the removal or addition of high or low value dots. While differences were found among characters, no differences among fonts or between the manner of degradation were evidenced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BauerH. J.Some solutions of visibility and legibility problems in changeable speed command signs. Washington: National Academy of Sciences–-National Research Council, Highway Research Board Bulletin 330, 1962.
2.
DickA. O.Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 16, 575–596.
3.
EllisB.BurrellG. J.WharfJ. H.HawkinsT. D. F.The format and colour of small matrix displays for use in high ambient illumination. Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Royal Aircraft Establishment, Technical Report 75048, May, 1975.
4.
EllisB.BurrellG. J.WharfJ.HawkinsT. D. F.PetersD. V.The performance in illuminances up to 80000 lux of a light emitting diode display having a 3 mm character height. Farnborough, Hants, U. K.: Royal Aircraft Establishment, Technical Report 74024, April, 1974.
5.
HaberR. N.Information-processing approaches to visual perception. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1969.
6.
HockH. S.MarcusN.The effect of familiarity on the processing of fragmented figures. Perception and Psychophysics, 1976, 20, 375–379.
7.
KirkR. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
8.
LongE. R.ReidL. S.QuealR. W.Factors determining the legibility of letters and words derived from elemental printers. Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio: Wright Air Development Center, Technical Report 5924, August, 1951.
9.
MaddoxM. E.BurnetteJ. T.GutmannJ. C.Font comparison for 5 × 7 characters. Human Factors, 1977, 19, 89–93.
10.
MIL-M-18012B. Design and configuration of markings for aircrew station displays. 20 July 1964.
11.
ShurtleffD. A.Legibility research. Proceedings of the S. I. D.1974, 15–2, 41–51.
