This paper is written primarily for the reader who is not expert in areas of communicative disorders nor actively engaged in research on devices to assist persons with hearing impairments. The intent is to provide a brief introduction and to explain some of the challenges associated with development of sensory aids for the deaf. The discussion also comments on some of the basic human factors questions that deserve attention in the context of improving communication aids.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BilgerR. C.Evaluation of subjects presently fitted with implanted auditory prostheses. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 1977, 86, Suppl. 38.
2.
BrownK. S.Genetic features of deafness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973, 54, 569–575.
3.
ChapanisA.GarnerW. R.MorganC. T.Applied experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1949, 250–256.
4.
ChapanisA.Van CottH. P.Human engineering tests and evaluations. In Van CottH. P.KinkadeR. G. (Eds.) Human engineering guide to equipment design. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972.
CudahyE.A.ElliottL. L.Temporal processing in noise by persons with noise-induced and age-related hearing loss (A). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 58, Suppl. 1, S71.
7.
DavisH.SilvermanS. R.Hearing and deafness (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1970.
8.
DrachmanD. A.LeavittJ.Memory impairment in the aged; storage versus retrieval deficit. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1972, 93, 302–308.
9.
ElkinsE. F.Evaluation of modified rhyme test results from impaired and normal hearing listeners. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1971, 14, 589–595.
10.
ElliottL. L.Tonal thresholds for short duration stimuli as related to subject hearing level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1963, 35, 578–580.
11.
ElliottL. L.Vocal pitch-matching. Washington, D.C.: Central Institute for the Deaf, Research Department Progress Report No. 13, 1970, 26–27.
12.
ElliottL. L.Performance of children from 11 to 17 years of age on a sentence test of speech intelligibility in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976, 60, Suppl. 1, S28.
13.
ElliottL. L.SherrickC. E.Report on workshop on visual and tactile aids for the deaf. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1976, 59, 486–489.
14.
EngelmanS.RosovR.Tactual hearing experiment with deaf and hearing subjects. Exceptional Children, 1975, 41, 243–253.
15.
FlanaganJ. L.Speech analysis: Synthesis and perception (2nd ed.). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1972
16.
GeldardF. A.SherrickC. F.Multiple cutaneous stimulation; the discrimination of vibrotactile patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1965, 37, 797–801.
17.
HouseW. F.UrbanJ.Long term results of electrode implantation and electronic stimulation of the cochlea in man. Annals of Otology, 1973, 504–517.
18.
InglisJ.SykesD. H.AnkusM. N.Age differences in short-term memory. In ChownS. S.RugelK. F., (Eds.), Psychological functioning in the normal aging and senile aged. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1968.
19.
JesteadtW.BilgerR. C.GreenD. M.PattersonJ. H.Temporal acuity in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1976, 19, 357–370.
20.
KalikowD. N.StevensK. N.ElliottL. L.Development of a list of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 61, 1337–1351.
21.
KirmanJ. H.Tactile communication of speech: a review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 1973, 80, 54–74.
22.
KirmanJ. H.Tactile apparent movement: the effects of interstimulus onset interval and stimulus duration. Perception and Psychophysics, 1974, 15, 1–6.
23.
KralV. A.Memory disorders in old age senility. In TallandG. A.WaughN. D. (Eds.), The pathology of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1969.
24.
KuhlP. K.MillerJ. D.Speech perception by the chinchilla: Phonetic boundaries for synthetic VOT stimuli. (A). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 57, Suppl. S49.
25.
LevittH.NyeP. W.Sensory training aids for the hearing impaired. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Engineering, 1971, 129.
26.
LibermanA.Perception of the speech code. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 74, 431–461.
27.
MaccobyE. E.JonesT. M.KonradK. W.Selective listening in later life. In ChownS. S.RiegelK. F. (Eds.), Psychological functioning in the normal aging and senile aged. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1968.
28.
MeisterD.RabideauG. F.Human factors evaluation in system development. New York: Wiley, 1965.
29.
MerzenichM. M.MichelsonR. P.PettitC. R.SchindlerR. A.ReidM.Neural encoding of sound sensation evoked by electrical stimulation of the acoustic nerve. Annals of Otology, 1973, 82, 486–503.
30.
MillerJ. D.EngebretsonA.M.GarfieldS.A.ScottB. L.New approach to speech-reception testing (A). Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1975, 57, Suppl. 1, S48.
31.
MorseP. A.Infant speech perception: a preliminary model and review of the literature. In Schiefel-bushR. L.LloydL. L. (Eds.), Language acquisition, retardation, and intervention. Baltimore, Maryland: University Park Press, 1974.
32.
NickersonR. S.Speech training and reception aids for the deaf, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bolt Beranek & Newman Report No. 2980, January, 1975, 119.
33.
NickersonR. S.KalikowD. N.StevensK. N.Computer-aided speech training for the deaf. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1976, 41, 120–132.
34.
NickersonR. S.StevensK. N.BoothroydA.AdamsR. E.StormR. D.Draft curriculum manual: a review of speech problems of the deaf and a preliminary guide to the use of the BBN system of speech-training aids. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Bolt Beranek & Newman Report No. 2911, September, 1974.
35.
PascoeD. P.Frequency responses of hearing aids and their effects on speech perception of hearing-impaired subjects. Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology, 1975, Suppl. 23, 84, 40.
36.
PascoeD. P.NiemoellerA. F.MillerJ. D.Hearing-aid design and evaluation. Washington, D.C.: Central Institute for the Deaf Research Department Periodic Progress Report No. 17, 1974, 34–36.
37.
PickettJ. M.Speech processing. Aids for communication handicaps: some research problems. In TowerD. B. (Ed.) The nervous system and its disorders: Vol. 3, Human communication and its disorders. New York: Raven, 1975.
38.
PickettJ. M.PickettB. H.Communication of speech sounds by a tactual recorder. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1963, 6, 207–222.
39.
SaundersF. A.Electrocutaneous displays. In GeldardF. (Ed.), Cutaneous communication systems and devices. Austin, Texas: Psychonomic Society, 1974, 33–38.
40.
SherrickC. E.The art of tactile communication. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 353–360.
41.
StarkR. E.The use of real-time visual displays of speech in the training of a profoundly deaf, non-speaking child: a case report. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1971, 36, 407–409.
42.
UptonH.Wearable eyeglass speech reading aid. American Annals of the Deaf, 1968, 113, 222–229.
43.
VillchurE.Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1973, 53, 1646–1657.
44.
WeisgerberR. A., et al., Educational evaluation of the Optacon as a reading aid to blind elementary and secondary students. Palo Alto, California: American Institutes for Research, Final Report OEC-72-5180, September, 1974.
45.
WightmanF. L.McGeeT.KramerM.Factors influencing frequency-selectivity in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. In EvansE. F.WilsonJ. P. (Eds.), Psychophysics and physiology of hearingNew York: Academic Press, 1977.
46.
WortmanP. M.Evaluation research: a psychological perspective. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 562–575.
47.
Yeni-KomshianG. H.GoldsteinM. H.Identification of speech sounds displayed on a vibrotactile vocoder. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977, 62, 194–198.
