A novel approach to selection/classification is described. The approach which combines the learning, performance test, and assessment center contexts has been verified in a variety of situations. There is reason to believe that the approach: (1) yields selection/classification devices which possess reliability, validity, and appropriate power, and (2) meets fairness criteria.
AshP.KroekerL. F.Personnel selection, classification, and placement. In M. R. Rosenberg and L. W. Porter (Eds.) Annual Review of Psychology, 1975, 26, 481–508.
3.
BloodM. R. Job samples: A better approach to selection testing? American Psychologist, 1974, 29, 218–219.
4.
BoehmVNegro-white differences in validity of employment and training selection procedures: Summary of research evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1972, 56, 33–39.
5.
BottenbergR. A.ChristalR. E.Grouping criteria: A method which retains maximum predictive efficiency. Journal of Experimental Education, 1968, 4, 28–34.
6.
BrayD. W.CampbellR. J.Selection of salesmen by means of an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 36–81.
7.
BrayD. W.GrantD. L.The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business and management. Psychological Monographs, 1966, 80, (17, Whole No. 625).
ChristalR. E.JAN: A technique for analyzing group judgment. Lackland Air Force Base, Texas: Personnel Research Laboratory and Aerospace Medical Division, PRL-TRD-63–3, February, 1963.
10.
ChristalR. E.JAN: A technique for analyzing group judgment. Journal of Experimental Education, 1968, 4, 24–27. (a)
11.
ChristalR. E.Selecting a harem—and other applications of the policy-capturing model. Journal of Experimental Education, 1968, 4, 35–41. (b)
12.
DawesR. M.Graduate admissions; A case study. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon Research Institute, 1970.
13.
DawesR. M.A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making. American Psychologist, 1971, 26, 180–188.
14.
First court test of assessment center method. Assessment and Development, 1976, 3, 1–2.
GoldbergL. R.Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence for a method of improving on clinical inferences. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 422–433.
19.
HammondK. R.HurschG. J.ToddF. J.Analyzing the components of clinical inference. Psychological Review, 1964, 71, 438–456.
20.
HowardE. A.An assessment of assessment centers. Academy of Management Journal, 1974, 17, 115–134.
21.
HuckJ. R.Assessment centers: A review of external and internal validation. Personnel Psychology, 1973, 36, 191–212.
22.
MacKinnonD. W.An overview of assessment centers. Berkeley: Center for Creative Leadership, University of California, Technical Report No. 1, 1975.
23.
MaddenJ. M.A policy capturing model for analyzing individual and group judgment for job evaluation. Lackland AFB, Texas: 6570th. Personnel Research Laboratory, Aerospace Devision, 1964.
SiegelA. I.FedermanP. J.Policy capturing for deriving content emphasis in technical training. Wayne, Pennsylvania: Applied Psychological Services, in press.
30.
SiegelA. I.LeahyW. R.Nonverbal and culture fair performance prediction procedures, III. Cross validation. Wayne, Pennsylvania: Applied Psychological Services, 1974.
31.
SiegelA. I.WiesenJ. P.Experimental procedures for the classification of Naval Personnel. San Diego: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center, NPRDCTR 77–3, 1977.
32.
SlovicPAnalyzing the expert judge: A descriptive study of a stockbroker's decision processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1969, 53, 255–263.
33.
SlovicP.LichtensteinS.Comparisons of Bayesian and regression approaches to study of information processing in judgment. Eugene, Oregon: Oregon Research Institute, 1970.
34.
StephensonR. W.WardJ. H.Computer-assisted discussions to help a policy group assign weights to criterion ratings. Personnel Psychology, 1971, 24, 447–461.
35.
WernimontP. F.CampbellJ. P.Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1968, 52, 327–376.
