Driver behavior in the vehicle-following situation, a major source of road accidents, was investigated using a controlled-track experiment. Drivers were found to adopt headways of approximately 2 s irrespective of speed of travel, driving experience, or instructed probability of the leading vehicle's stopping. Under the optimal conditions used, drivers demonstrated that such headways were more than adequate to avoid tail-end collisions in an emergency situation. The implications of these results for the development of perceptual-motor support devices and the attribution of causes in road accidents are discussed.
BarrettG. V.AlexanderR. A.ForbesJ. B.Analysis of performance measurement and training requirements for driver decision making in emergency situations. Rochester, New York: University of Rochester, Management Research Center, Report No. DOT HS-800 867, 1973.
3.
BrownI. D.Motorway crashes in fog—Who's to blame. New Scientist, December 24, 1970, 544–545.
4.
DentonG. G.A subjective scale of speed when driving a motor vehicle.Ergonomics, 1966, 9, 203–210.
5.
DentonG. G.The influence of visual pattern on perceived speed. Crowthorne, England: Department of the Environment, Road Research Laboratory, Report No. 409, 1971.
6.
EvansL.RotheryR.Detection of the sign of relative motion when following a vehicle.Human Factors, 1974, 16, 161–173.
7.
GoodenoughD. R.A review of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in auto safety.Human Factors, 1976, 18, 53–62.
8.
GordonD. A.MichaelsR. M.Static and dynamic fields in vehicular guidance.Highway Research Record, 1965, 84, 1–15.
9.
HarmsP. L.Driver following studies on the M4 motorway during a holiday and a normal weekend in 1966. Crowthorne, England: Ministry of Transport, Road Research Laboratory, Report No. LR 136, 1966.
10.
HarveyL. O.MichonJ. A.The perception of maneuvers of moving vehicles. Progress report I. Effects of viewing distance and angular separation. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, TNO, Report No. IZF 1971-C6, 1971.
11.
HoffmanE. R.Detection of vehicle velocity changes in car following. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference of the Australian Road Research Board, 1968.
12.
IrvingA.The perceptual problems of the driver. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Driver Behavior, Zurich, October, 1973.
13.
JanssenW. H.The perception of maneuvers of moving vehicles. Progress report IV. Perceptibility of relative sagittal motion on the basis of changes in the apparent size or brightness of tail-lights. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, TNO, Report No. IZF 1972-C6, 1972.
14.
JanssenW. H.The perception of maneuvers of moving vehicles. Progress report V. Thresholds for relative vehicle motion in depth: A check in the field. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, TNO, Report No. IZF 1973-C12, 1973.
15.
JanssenW. H.The perception of maneuvers of moving vehicles. Progress report VI (final report). Implications of psychophysical threshold measurements for the night driving situation. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, TNO, Report No. IZF 1974-C12, 1974.
KirkR. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences.Belmont, California: Brooks/Cole, 1968.
18.
LehmanF. G.FoxP.Safe distances in car-following.Traffic Safety Research Review, 1967, 11, 80–83.
19.
MichonJ. A.Traffic participation—Some ergonomic issues. Soesterberg, The Netherlands: Institute for Perception, TNO, Report No. IZF 1973–14, 1973.
20.
MortimerR. G.Hard braking is more common than you might think. Automotive Engineering, August, 1971.
21.
OlsonP. L.Aspects of driving performance as a function of field dependence.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 192–196.
22.
PelzD. C.SchumanS. H.Are young drivers really more dangerous after controlling for exposure and experience?Journal of Safety Research, 1971, 3, 68–79.
23.
PrenticeH. A. J.The perception of speed and distance in the driving task. Paper presented at the Fifth International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, London, June, 1974.
24.
RobinsonB. H.Toward measurement of attention as a function of risk and risk preference in man-machine systems.Human Factors, 1975, 17, 236–242.
25.
RockwellT.Skills, judgment and information acquisition in driving. In ForbesT. W. (Ed.) Human factors in highway traffic safety research.New York: Wiley Inter-science, 1972.
26.
RutleyK. S.Control of drivers' speed by means other than enforcement.Ergonomics, 1975, 18, 89–100.
27.
RutleyK. S.MaceD. G. W.An evaluation of a brakelight display which indicates the severity of braking. Crowthorne, England: Ministry of Transport, Road Research Laboratory, Report No. LR 287, 1969.
28.
SabeyB. E.Accident analysis in Great Britain. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Driver Behavior, Zurich, October, 1973.
29.
VoevodksyJ.Evaluation of a deceleration warning light for reducing rear-end automobile collisions.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1974, 59, 270–273.
30.
WeinerB.Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition.Chicago: Markham, 1972.
