Four groups of 12 subjects were run for two sessions to determine the influence of stimulus presentation rate in a monitoring task. Two stimulus rates were used, 12 and 60 per minute. Stimulus rate significantly affected detections on both days, but no transfer effect was found.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ColquhounW. P.EdwardsR. S.Practice effects on a visual vigilance task with and without search. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 537–545.
2.
JerisonH. J.PickettR. M.StensonH. H.The elicited observing rate and decision processes in vigilance. Human Factors, 1965, 7, 107–128.
3.
WienerE. L.Transfer of training from one monitoring task to another. Ergonomics. 1967, 10, 649–658.
4.
WienerE. L.Training for vigilance: Repeated sessions with knowledge of results. Ergonomics, 1968, 11, 547–556.
5.
WienerE. L.Adaptive measurement of vigilance decrement. Ergonomics, 1973, 16, 353–363.
