The Effects of Previous Learning on the Visual Perception of Velocity

Abstract

Twenty subjects were shown a film containing 54 presentations of a moving standard disc followed immediately by one of six well-known target objects moving at the identical velocity. The subjects were asked to judge the speed of the target in relation to the standard. Judgments were made in arbitrary numbers from 0-50 to enable calculation of error magnitude as well as direction. It was hypothesized that objects which are known to move fast would be overestimated in relation to the standard while objects known to move slow would be underestimated. The results did not fully support the hypotheses. However, they did point up a need for research into the possible existence of differential modes of perception mediated by changes in objective speed of the target.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brown

J. F.

The visual perception of velocity. Psychologische Forschung, 1931, 14, 199–232.

Ellingstad

Heimstra

N. W.

Velocity time estimation as a function of target speed and concealment extent. Human Factors, 1969, 11, 305–312.

Fineberg

M. L.

Effects of object distance, shape, closing velocity, and aviator experience on obstacle avoidance behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of America, Washington, D. C., 1975.

Kennedy

R. S.

Yessenow

M. D.

Wendt

G. R.

Magnitude estimation of visual velocity. Journal of Psychology, 1972, 82, 133–144.

Kozyrkova

M. G.

Study of dynamic visual acuity. Problemy Fiziologicheskoi Optiki, (USSR) 1969, 15, 138–141.

Reynolds

H. N.

Temporal estimation in the perception of occluded motion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1968, 26, 407–416.

Stevens

S. S.

On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review, 1957, 64, 153–181.

Winer

B. J.

Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.