Driving skills depend greatly upon efficient estimates of length and distance. The present study found that male and female subjects between the ages of 16–79 grossly underestimated the length of both the guidelines and the spaces between guidelines used on Massachusetts state highways when tested by memory and under actual driving conditions. It is proposed that this major illusion should be dealt with through driver education or through improvement of highway design.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BurgA.An investigation of some relationships between dynamic visual acuity, static visual acuity, and driving record. Report No. 64–18. Los Angeles: University of California, Department of Engineering, April, 1964.
2.
BurgA.Vision and driving: A report on research. Human Factors, 1971, 73, 79–87.
DallenbachK. M.The elastic effect: An optical illusion of expansion. American Journal of Psychology, 1953, 66, 634–636.
5.
ErnstR.RockwellT. H.Motion sensitivity in driving. EES 202B-4, Engineering Experimental Station, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, April, 1966. Cited by T. W. Forbes, Human factors in highway traffic safety research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972, 138–141.
6.
GoldsteinL. F.Research on human variables in safe motor vehicle operation: A correlational summary of predictor variables and criterion measures. Washington, D. C.: George Washington University, Driver Behavior Research Project, 1961.
7.
GordonD. A.MastT. M.Driver's human factors in overtaking and passing. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 341–346.
8.
HarwayN. I.Judgment of distance in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963, 65, 385–390.
9.
HochbergJ.SmithO.Landing strip markings and the “Expansion Pattern” I. Program, preliminary analysis, and apparatus. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1955, 5, 81–92.
10.
JonesH. V.HeimstraN. W.Ability of drivers to make critical passing judgments. Highway Research Record, 1966, No. 122, Publication 1364, 89–93.
11.
LauerA. R.The eyes behind the windshield. National Safety News, Nov., 1932, 34–35.
12.
LauerA. R.The psychology of driving.Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas, 1960, 324.
13.
LuriaS. M.KinneyJ. S.WeissmanS.Distance estimates with “filled” and “unfilled” space. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 1007–1010.
14.
McLeanJ. R.HoffmanE. R.The effects of restricted preview on driver steering control and performance. Human Factors, 1973, 15, 407–419.
15.
MefferdR. B.ReddingG. M.WielandB. A.Depth perception and its special case, slant in depth, as independent of apparent orientation (perspective) in depth. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 679–690.
16.
MourantR. R.RockwellT. H.Mapping eye movement patterns to the visual scene in driving: An exploratory study. Human Factors, 1970, 12, 81–87.
17.
PurdyJ.GibsonE. J.Distance judgment by the method of fractionation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1955, 50, 374–380.
18.
RockwellT. H.SniderJ. N.An investigation of variability in driving performance. RF 1450, Research Foundation, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 1967. Cited by T. W. Forbes, Human factors in highway traffic safety research. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1972, 138–141.
19.
SilverC.BloomJ.Information requirements for passing. Proceedings of the December 1966 Contractors Conference, Bureau of Public Roads, Langley, Virginia.
20.
Street list of residents in the Town of Milton.Abington, Mass.: Fougere Printing Company, Inc., 1972, 305.
21.
U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Manual on uniform traffic control devices for streets and highways, Washington, D. C.: U. S. Government Printing Office, 1970, 179.
